By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - SJW: Most Abused Term Ever?

Jumpin said:

It's a term primarily used by conservatives. The same guys whose idea of an intelligent conversation involves the multi-national government cover-up of the flat shape of our planet and the links it has to the global warming agenda and the Clintons murdering a bunch of people for illuminati. You can't expect a lot of brain power behind what these chuckleheads write.

Joke post?

Absolutely nothing about this is even close to being accurate..



 

"We hold these truths to be self-evident - all men and women created by the, go-you know.. you know the thing!" - Joe Biden

Around the Network
VGPolyglot said:
contestgamer said:

They're not all on the same standing, but they were all virtually on a higher stading then women. That's the point. Although some people may be on a lower standing among men, they always had the satisfaction of being on a higher standing than almost all women which has been taken away.

That's assuming that it's a zero-sum game. If it's competition based, yes, but cooperation based is not zero-sum. And in order to have cooperation, there needs to be equal standing to avoid one side dominating the other.

contestgamer said:

Progressives are the far left. If they weren't they wouldn't be called progressives, they'd just be called liberals or center left

No, progressives are not the far left. Anarchists, communists, socialists, that's the far left. Progressives are centre-left.

 

No way, those would be the extreme left, the authoratarian left. Obama/Clinton are center left. I'm going to assume as a progressive that you believe in most if not all the following;

 

-universal free health care

-tax rate for the rich above 40% (redistribution to the bottom)

-probably strict gun control with limited or no civilian gun access

-$15 min wage

-slashing of the overseas military budget and substantially cutting overseas bases

-substantial investments in fighting climate change 

-legalizing all drugs

-legalizing prostitution

-reparations for african americans

-cultural appropriation is a thing

-late term abortions

-affirmitive action

 

...and so on. Added togethe these arent center left beliefs, these are far, far left. 



contestgamer said:
VGPolyglot said:

That's assuming that it's a zero-sum game. If it's competition based, yes, but cooperation based is not zero-sum. And in order to have cooperation, there needs to be equal standing to avoid one side dominating the other.

No, progressives are not the far left. Anarchists, communists, socialists, that's the far left. Progressives are centre-left.

 

No way, those would be the extreme left, the authoratarian left. Obama/Clinton are center left. I'm going to assume as a progressive that you believe in most if not all the following;

 

-universal free health care

-tax rate for the rich above 40% (redistribution to the bottom)

-probably strict gun control with limited or no civilian gun access

-$15 min wage

-slashing of the overseas military budget and substantially cutting overseas bases

-substantial investments in fighting climate change 

-legalizing all drugs

-legalizing prostitution

-reparations for african americans

-cultural appropriation is a thing

-late term abortions

-affirmitive action

 

...and so on. Added togethe these arent center left beliefs, these are far, far left. 

No, I'm not a progressive, I'm an anarchist communist. So, things like wage labour and the state in general I oppose the existence of. The stances you listed are pretty centre-left.



Yeah it's annoying. People seem to want to be extreme with their views and put aside rationality. I get there's a liberal agenda, and it does have a prominent influence on entertainment as a whole, but the degree and lengths some people on the right go to to shun it is pathetic.

Like they go the other way and are outright abusive the way they talk about women, even if it's not how they really think, it's reactionary sexism. Same with racism, people calling black people the N word on Black Lives Matter videos just to be cunts, even if they wouldn't do so in public.

On the other hand there's an awful lot of shit that white people catch from these leftists. For example a video telling white people what to say and how to act in a smug way is never going to go down well (referring to 'dear white people' video). It provokes reactions of sexism and racism. Not because that's how those people really are deep down, but because they want to fuck the creators of that video off somehow, so why not do the exact opposite of what they told them?

Sometimes it's almost as if the left are trying to stir shit. And the right always take the bait. This is why we see such extreme views from both sides. Humans can be really stupid.



VGPolyglot said:
contestgamer said:

 

No way, those would be the extreme left, the authoratarian left. Obama/Clinton are center left. I'm going to assume as a progressive that you believe in most if not all the following;

 

-universal free health care

-tax rate for the rich above 40% (redistribution to the bottom)

-probably strict gun control with limited or no civilian gun access

-$15 min wage

-slashing of the overseas military budget and substantially cutting overseas bases

-substantial investments in fighting climate change 

-legalizing all drugs

-legalizing prostitution

-reparations for african americans

-cultural appropriation is a thing

-late term abortions

-affirmitive action

 

...and so on. Added togethe these arent center left beliefs, these are far, far left. 

No, I'm not a progressive, I'm an anarchist communist. So, things like wage labour and the state in general I oppose the existence of. The stances you listed are pretty centre-left.

 

Wait, what other kind of labour is there besides wage labour? (besides slave labour which I assume you arent proposing)



Around the Network
coolbeans said:
Jumpin said:

It's a term primarily used by conservatives. The same guys whose idea of an intelligent conversation involves the multi-national government cover-up of the flat shape of our planet and the links it has to the global warming agenda and the Clintons murdering a bunch of people for illuminati. You can't expect a lot of brain power behind what these chuckleheads write.

Dat broad brush doe.  

If you see a person using the acronym SJW all the time as their counter arguement against anyone with a progressive idea, there's an extraordinarily high chance that they're a part of the crazy stratum of conservatives, full of conspiracy theories, and possessing a substandard intellect.



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.

Jumpin said:
coolbeans said:

Dat broad brush doe.  

If you see a person using the acronym SJW all the time as their counter arguement against anyone with a progressive idea, there's an extraordinarily high chance that they're a part of the crazy stratum of conservatives, full of conspiracy theories, and possessing a substandard intellect.

That's backwards. Alot of the left considers progressives SJWs for the most part because they're responsible for things like culture appropriation and that sort of shit made trump being electied possible. 



Aeolus451 said:
Jumpin said:

If you see a person using the acronym SJW all the time as their counter arguement against anyone with a progressive idea, there's an extraordinarily high chance that they're a part of the crazy stratum of conservatives, full of conspiracy theories, and possessing a substandard intellect.

That's backwards. Alot of the left considers progressives SJWs for the most part because they're responsible for things like culture appropriation and that sort of shit made trump being electied possible. 

You haven't disagreed with me on a logical standpoint.  People who are against progress are, by definition, conservative. So whatever anti-progress "left" people you are talking about are conservatives. These are the chuckleheads I am talking about.



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.

Jumpin said:
Aeolus451 said:

That's backwards. Alot of the left considers progressives SJWs for the most part because they're responsible for things like culture appropriation and that sort of shit made trump being electied possible. 

You haven't disagreed with me on a logical standpoint.  People who are against progress are, by definition, conservative. So whatever anti-progress "left" people you are talking about are conservatives. These are the chuckleheads I am talking about.

Progressive does not equate to progress nor does it stand for it in actuality. That's just a political group trying to conflate their group with or use things that are good (progress or equality) as symbols that no one would disagree wtih unless they're a bad person to most people.

Also, anyone who disagrees with progressives doesn't mean that they are a conservative or make them one. 




Aeolus451 said:
Jumpin said:

You haven't disagreed with me on a logical standpoint.  People who are against progress are, by definition, conservative. So whatever anti-progress "left" people you are talking about are conservatives. These are the chuckleheads I am talking about.

Progressive does not equate to progress nor does it stand for it in actuality. That's just a political group trying to conflate their group with or use things that are good (progress or equality) as symbols that no one would disagree wtih unless they're a bad person to most people.

Also, anyone who disagrees with progressives doesn't mean that they are a conservative or make them one. 


So far, you have some weird definition of progress, and you have claimed it is the left that are going around calling everyone an SJW.

Just a guess, but you're conservative and American?



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.