By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - America is a bigger threat to world peace than North Korea

KLXVER said:
Ruler said:

You just did, and you used weapons of mass destruction 

Im not the US. Also its not like they threw a dart on a world map and decided to bomb there.

They pretty much did, there was no reason to use this weapon for example. Its quite hypocritical to call North Korea irrational if America does the same now, testing weapon of mass destruction, but unlike North korea they tested it on other human beings.

FallingTitan said:

can't we all just nuke North korea off the map and be done with them.

and russia needs to shut up. at least usa warned them to get thier shitty 4000 troops out. they are backing a chemical weapon overlord in syria why can't usa just fight russia and korea at the same time.

 

the british are right. the usa response was just and fair. it was freedom! I think they shoulda done more.

Leadified said:
No kidding, however Russia shouldn't be talking about threats to world peace here when they're just as guilty.                                      

There was no proof of chemical weapons being used by Assad. If the US wouldnt have invaded Iraq and wouldnt have sanctioned Syria and sponsored these protests in the first place, all of this wouldnt have happened. Russia did good things for the world vetoing everything the US wanted, just look what happened in Lybia its even worse now without Gadafi. Lybia used to be one of the richest countries in Africa and now its balkanized and completley in ruins, ISIS is also spreading there rapidley.

Its funny how North Korea tested Nukes for quite some time now but no one losed as much sleep at night as now, so yeah the Russian politician is absolutley right.

KLAMarine said:
Ruler said:

You just did, and you used weapons of mass destruction 

Yes. On ISIS. The guys who have taken credit for numerous terrorist attacks around the world?

At the end of this sentence is the world's tiniest violin playing for all the dead ISIS fighters.

Ljink96 said:
I have to agree, and it even scares me. We're using the largest non-nuclear bomb, something we haven't done in years, on 31 terrorists... who knows how many civilians have lost their lives at our hands. I said it once, I'll say it again, I don't stand by a single fucking thing Trump does.

Oh those poor, poor terrorists. Why can't we let them coordinate deliberate attacks on civilians in peace?

That doesnt give the US the right to use the GBU-43, a weapon of mass destruction against anyone. When just some days ago the US accused Assad of using some of his allgeged chemical weapons of mass destruction, and is now accusing North Korea of wanting to test weapons of mass destruction. Thats pretty hypocritical if you ask me.



Around the Network

lol of course these Americans would disagree that their country threatening world peace. I agree as an American, America gets a type of priority and advantage, so when they do something threatening, it can be easily excused; but if any other country did something threatening it would be taken more heavily in media.

This article shows the truth



ratuscafoarterea said:
KLXVER said:

So we should wait until they are before we do something?

Saudi Arabia and Pakistan HAVE DONE more harm to USA and the American people, then NK will ever do, so yes, indeed, Murica FTW.

You've got one thing wrong. USA has done more harm to Pakistan then Pakistan ever could to USA and North Korea ever could to USA. If there was a score system of damage like course coverage in splatoon between USA and Pakistan more than 95% of the harm points would go to USA. Murica created the damn Taliban and Osama bin Ladin was their rogue agent and the Taliban have caused so much pain and suffering in Pakistan. I'm not saying the Pakistani government is innocent but the bulk of the blame goes to USA. Combine that with the hundreds of innocents that Murica kills with illegal international law breaking drone strikes in Pakistan and you have a situation like what you have all over the middle east. Murica creates terrorists and then goes on to kill innocents while the terrorists also kill innocents and murica does nothing to actually destroy those terrorists so they both go on an innocent killing spree. Thank goodness the Pakistani government and military was strong enough otherwise Pakistan could have become like Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon and Syria. That's the next phase of the ever repeating story. Murica has a problem with the ruler of the country where it created those terrorists and does more  to damage the government then the terrorists and once the government is toppled total chaos assumes and the country falls in a deeper ditch then it has ever fallen in its entire history as a region not just a nation. Syria is in the last phase where Assad is still standing but Murica is trying its best to destroy the Syrian government instead of Daesh. Regarding Saudi Arabia its the country that's paying Murica Dolla Dolla bills so no harm will come to them. But again US has damaged and caused destruction in Pakistan not the other way around. Never since the inception of Pakistan has it ever been the other way around



Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also

KLXVER said:
ratuscafoarterea said:

Saudi Arabia and Pakistan HAVE DONE more harm to USA and the American people, then NK will ever do, so yes, indeed, Murica FTW.

Well if you want them to strike first, then fair enough I guess.

My point is that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan have harmed/killed Americans before (strike first) and USA hasn't done anything in retaliation.

Maybe you want to leave the bias at the door, and use your brain.



ratuscafoarterea said:
KLXVER said:

Well if you want them to strike first, then fair enough I guess.

My point is that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan have harmed/killed Americans before (strike first) and USA hasn't done anything in retaliation.

Maybe you want to leave the bias at the door, and use your brain.

 

Yes and maybe the US dont want anyone to get hurt this time, so they take care of it before it happens.



Around the Network
KLXVER said:
ratuscafoarterea said:

My point is that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan have harmed/killed Americans before (strike first) and USA hasn't done anything in retaliation.

Maybe you want to leave the bias at the door, and use your brain.

 

Yes and maybe the US dont want anyone to get hurt this time, so they take care of it before it happens.

You’re so dumb you don't realize you're contradicting yourself. I’ll say, it’s very entertaining.

And yes, you can go on and cry to the mods.

 

-User was banned for this post ~Ryuu96

 



ratuscafoarterea said:
KLXVER said:

Yes and maybe the US dont want anyone to get hurt this time, so they take care of it before it happens.

You’re so dumb you don't realize you're contradicting yourself. I’ll say, it’s very entertaining.

And yes, you can go on and cry to the mods.

 

How am I contradicting myself?

I just think your insults are cute. I have a thick skin. No need to report anything.



KLXVER said:
Eagle367 said:

You do know that USA supports terrorists that you people call rebels in Syria. And most people in the world don't buy USA's story of Assad doing the chemical attack since there is no proof he did it. But more people do find it plausible that the US backed rebels carried out the chemical attacks. You also should know the USA is more interested in dethroning Assad to install a puppet ruler than dealing with real terrorists like Daesh. And the fact that USA has probably killed more innocents in the middle east than Assad, Daesh, Taliban or Al-Qaeda ever have. Knowing all that is a must for you whether you accept the facts or not here they are. Its not a feeling or what tour emotions tell you its the truth unbuffered and without considering anyone's feelings since the truth is devoid of feeling its just what it is

People always use the "They have killed more, so they are worse" argument. I mean are we better than all the cops in the world that have killed someone? Was Ted Bundy better than a war veteran that has killed more people?

Except you are twisting logic here. Cops are not a single group and some cops have killed for all the wrong reasons like the us cops that kill African Americans for no reason while some genuinely kill as a last effort with no other way of doing things while some are corrupt and kill to keep honest people quiet about their corruption. I don't know the ted fella but if the war veteran was a US war veteran in Vietnam or participated in the killings of innocents in the middle east or wherever then yes the war veteran is probably worse than the Ted guy. And Murica has no reason for killing the majority of the innocents it kills. Senseless killing just like the terrorists. In cold blood clear cit state sponsored terrorism if you aks me. Murica ahas killed hundreds of innocents if not thousands in drone strikes in Pakistan, Afghanistan and the middle east. Imagine doing that in UK or France just to kill one terrorist while killing 20 innocents for that one terrorist. I said imagine UK or France since you don't consider Pakistani or Asian lives in general to be of the Same standard as European or western lives. Then there is the fact that USA has burned down many villages in Afghanistan again killing many innocents for some terrorists. The false strou about Iraq having WMDs to attack Iraq and again killing thousands of innocents in a pointless war. Then there are the report of US killing thousands of innocents in Syria per month. That's right per month. You can also look at the carnage US caused by looking at pre-US invasion countries and post-US invasion countries like Syria before and Iraq before and Afghanistan before and Lybia before and Lebanon before. The conditions might not have been ideal but Mich better before US involvement. When killing more innocents then some of the world's most dangerous terrorists probably even combined then damn sure killing more INNOCENTS is a good metric to show what is evil and what isn't. It isn't a righteous cause or war of necessity that the US is fighting and killing innocents in, its a war of pleasure, control, profit and doing it just because you can. That's what makes it worse and evil. Even now US is more concerned with Assad than Daesh and the president is likely more concerned with which store sells his daughter's items then the lives of Americans let alone the people that the US kills and the regions that it destroys. In fact he recently sounded like he wanted to have sex with a cake and couldn't remember he bombed syria



Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also

Eagle367 said:
KLXVER said:

People always use the "They have killed more, so they are worse" argument. I mean are we better than all the cops in the world that have killed someone? Was Ted Bundy better than a war veteran that has killed more people?

Except you are twisting logic here. Cops are not a single group and some cops have killed for all the wrong reasons like the us cops that kill African Americans for no reason while some genuinely kill as a last effort with no other way of doing things while some are corrupt and kill to keep honest people quiet about their corruption. I don't know the ted fella but if the war veteran was a US war veteran in Vietnam or participated in the killings of innocents in the middle east or wherever then yes the war veteran is probably worse than the Ted guy. And Murica has no reason for killing the majority of the innocents it kills. Senseless killing just like the terrorists. In cold blood clear cit state sponsored terrorism if you aks me. Murica ahas killed hundreds of innocents if not thousands in drone strikes in Pakistan, Afghanistan and the middle east. Imagine doing that in UK or France just to kill one terrorist while killing 20 innocents for that one terrorist. I said imagine UK or France since you don't consider Pakistani or Asian lives in general to be of the Same standard as European or western lives. Then there is the fact that USA has burned down many villages in Afghanistan again killing many innocents for some terrorists. The false strou about Iraq having WMDs to attack Iraq and again killing thousands of innocents in a pointless war. Then there are the report of US killing thousands of innocents in Syria per month. That's right per month. You can also look at the carnage US caused by looking at pre-US invasion countries and post-US invasion countries like Syria before and Iraq before and Afghanistan before and Lybia before and Lebanon before. The conditions might not have been ideal but Mich better before US involvement. When killing more innocents then some of the world's most dangerous terrorists probably even combined then damn sure killing more INNOCENTS is a good metric to show what is evil and what isn't. It isn't a righteous cause or war of necessity that the US is fighting and killing innocents in, its a war of pleasure, control, profit and doing it just because you can. That's what makes it worse and evil. Even now US is more concerned with Assad than Daesh and the president is likely more concerned with which store sells his daughter's items then the lives of Americans let alone the people that the US kills and the regions that it destroys. In fact he recently sounded like he wanted to have sex with a cake and couldn't remember he bombed syria

Im sorry, but casualties of war is not the same thing as just killing innocent people. Its horrible sure, but theres a difference. They are fighting terrorism and its not as simple as one country fighting another in this case. Its a very complicated situation that nobody has a clear answer to.

I have never said that Asian lives(which includes Pakistan btw) are less then any other and you know it. Thats a low blow.



I'm Canadian and I disagree with this thread 100%. It's stupid and should be closed/deleted. Apparently the OP knows nothing about N Korea and what it does to millions of its own people.