America is a bigger threat to world peace than North Korea

[Eagle367]

KLXVER said:

Eagle367 said:

You do know that USA supports terrorists that you people call rebels in Syria. And most people in the world don't buy USA's story of Assad doing the chemical attack since there is no proof he did it. But more people do find it plausible that the US backed rebels carried out the chemical attacks. You also should know the USA is more interested in dethroning Assad to install a puppet ruler than dealing with real terrorists like Daesh. And the fact that USA has probably killed more innocents in the middle east than Assad, Daesh, Taliban or Al-Qaeda ever have. Knowing all that is a must for you whether you accept the facts or not here they are. Its not a feeling or what tour emotions tell you its the truth unbuffered and without considering anyone's feelings since the truth is devoid of feeling its just what it is

People always use the "They have killed more, so they are worse" argument. I mean are we better than all the cops in the world that have killed someone? Was Ted Bundy better than a war veteran that has killed more people?

Except you are twisting logic here. Cops are not a single group and some cops have killed for all the wrong reasons like the us cops that kill African Americans for no reason while some genuinely kill as a last effort with no other way of doing things while some are corrupt and kill to keep honest people quiet about their corruption. I don't know the ted fella but if the war veteran was a US war veteran in Vietnam or participated in the killings of innocents in the middle east or wherever then yes the war veteran is probably worse than the Ted guy. And Murica has no reason for killing the majority of the innocents it kills. Senseless killing just like the terrorists. In cold blood clear cit state sponsored terrorism if you aks me. Murica ahas killed hundreds of innocents if not thousands in drone strikes in Pakistan, Afghanistan and the middle east. Imagine doing that in UK or France just to kill one terrorist while killing 20 innocents for that one terrorist. I said imagine UK or France since you don't consider Pakistani or Asian lives in general to be of the Same standard as European or western lives. Then there is the fact that USA has burned down many villages in Afghanistan again killing many innocents for some terrorists. The false strou about Iraq having WMDs to attack Iraq and again killing thousands of innocents in a pointless war. Then there are the report of US killing thousands of innocents in Syria per month. That's right per month. You can also look at the carnage US caused by looking at pre-US invasion countries and post-US invasion countries like Syria before and Iraq before and Afghanistan before and Lybia before and Lebanon before. The conditions might not have been ideal but Mich better before US involvement. When killing more innocents then some of the world's most dangerous terrorists probably even combined then damn sure killing more INNOCENTS is a good metric to show what is evil and what isn't. It isn't a righteous cause or war of necessity that the US is fighting and killing innocents in, its a war of pleasure, control, profit and doing it just because you can. That's what makes it worse and evil. Even now US is more concerned with Assad than Daesh and the president is likely more concerned with which store sells his daughter's items then the lives of Americans let alone the people that the US kills and the regions that it destroys. In fact he recently sounded like he wanted to have sex with a cake and couldn't remember he bombed syria