Seems to have been a huge leak from a user from reddit.(whom has since deleted his account)

https://www.reddit.com/r/NintendoSwitch/comments/5tsruy/leaked_indevelopment_ui_mockups/

Also on Gaf: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1343614&page=1 (thanks wyrdness)

Keep in mind, these documents are from an era where the device was called the NX still, so specs and features could have easily been added, removed, improved or worsened. 

Some takeaways from this :

OS uses 750MB Ram. 3.25GB Usable by developers.

Dev units did have 64GB Storage, Retail has 32GB

Unreal 4: The NX version will include these latest revisions, and will be optimized so that you can create games while taking full advantage of the hardware performance. Note that there may be restrictions on available functionality, depending on NX performance.

The device does not have a built-in mic. A headset must be connected to this port to use in-game chat or similar features.

Game Cards only go up to 32GB at the moment, Capacity variations include 1 GB, 2 GB, 4 GB, 8 GB, 16 GB, and 32 GB.

Pro Controller doesn't have IR, but does have accelerometers and gryos.

Pro Controller has 2 Linear resonant actuators, which allow HD rumble. This is probably the main reason why it costs so much. 

SoC equivalent to Tegra X1 from NVIDIA.

Battery charges last for approximately three hours (the same as for the Nintendo 3DS). 

NX specifications will not use region locks. As a result, it will be possible to play any downloadable software on any NX.  So, no worries about downloadable content based off of this rumor. It's up to the developer to allow downloads from any region.

xbox one is like 80watts? or so to reach 1.4 teraflops.

Switch is like 20? watts.

Its just not possible.

That I don't know, so I guess I shouldn't put that in the title. It could be FP16... due to performance of Zelda alone.

The thing is, the document says 1024 Flops. So I can't really assume at this point. I kinda doubt switch would be .5TF, we've heard .75 from digital foundry. The document is confusing. It really doesn't specify if it's a Megaflop, Gigaflop or at FP16 or 32 but you are most likely right. 

It could be 1024Gflops and be 1TF FP16, or 1024Gflops FP32, aka 512TF. But do hardware manufacturers default to FP16 when noting specs?

All this is saying is that it has the capacity to do 4K out, not necessarily that games will run at 4K resolutions. That'd depend on the GPU if I'm correct, which isn't that great. We won't be seeing 4K games on the Switch...ever. 

Is that good for a "handheld"?

When its portable only its like 150 Gflops.

Which is 3 times the power of the PS Vita.

Well then, that would be cool. But those were 3DS cartridges, which price depreceated over time. Switch carts are an entirely new beast from 3DS cards. Doesn't that play a role in price? Of course if Nintendo buys in bulk, they can get some cheap prices. I hope that high compression is an option for developers, but something's telling me Nintenod's going to want us to use sd cards for bigger games. It's just the Nintendo thing to do at this point. Now that I think about it we'll most likely get more than 32gb cards later as 3DS didn't get 8gb cards until later after launch.

If it also means anything, wikipedia has Switch with a max 128GB card size : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nintendo_game_card 

So, I'm probably just putting too much on these documents at this point. 

Why the hell is the Switch fitted with so little storage memory. The maximum size of launch Switch cartridges appears to be 8GB (64Gb) and 16GB (128Gb) but most games appear to be on much smaller cartridges.

Do you have a link for this 32GB equals bluray manufacturing cost. How much is a writable bluray disc because they normally cost more than pressed blurays and still pretty cheap.

Actually, PS2 did have HD games. GT 4 could be played at 1080i and Valkyrie Profile: Silmeria also could. 

xbox one is like 80watts? or so to reach 1.4 teraflops.

Switch is like 20? watts.

Its just not possible.

The thing is, the document says 1024 Flops. So I can't really assume at this point. I kinda doubt switch would be .5TF, we've heard .75 from digital foundry. The document is confusing. It really doesn't specify if it's a Megaflop, Gigaflop or at FP16 or 32 but you are most likely right. 

It could be 1024Gflops and be 1TF FP16, or 1024Gflops FP32, aka 512TF. But do hardware manufacturers default to FP16 when noting specs?

It wasn't rendering the game at 1080i. The Playstation 2 simply did not have the hardware to do so with acceptable image quality and framerate.
It was using a few tricks to "upscale" the game to 1080i.

1080i is field rendered, it takes 540P and builds it into a 1080i signal.

Now the original Xbox was able to pull off a few games at 720P and 1080i natively.