I was talking about the 2160. Not overall pixelcount.

Like, pixels per inch.

1080=720*1.5

2160=720*3

That's more about the scalingside of life. Not the overall pixelcount. You can get a 'perfect' blow up with 3 times the pixels (for each direction), which doesn't work for 1080p.

Or calculate way more appropriate interpolation results for 'new' pixels.

So think and Check before posting.

You can play semantics and disagree all you want.

The Switch has a 6.2" screen which is roughly in-line with most Smart Phones being 5.5 - 6.0" these days.
Has 4Gb of Ram when most well-equipped handsets have 3Gb+ these days. Same type of "LPDDR" is used as well.
Has 32Gb of NAND as internal storage just like the average smart phone.
Has a mobile SoC based on the ARM architecture, just like every smartphone out there these days.

It's OS is likely Android derived, just like over a Billion other smart phone handsets these days.

It has Vulkan, OpenGL ES and Open GL 4.5 just the majority of Smartphones support these days.

And you are telling me it's more like a PC? Common. Tell me you aren't serious. :/

I just gave you some examples on what it does change. Saying it doesn't change anything is moronic.
There are various methods to improve an image whilst it's being upscaled.

Take Overwatch for example on the Playstation 4 Pro. It still runs at 1080P. - However it's User-Interface is rendered at 4k, which is nice, clean and sharp.

I clearly talking about functionality of Switch, while you talking about hardware, mobile hardware doesnt mean nothing if fact is that phones are mini PCs if we talk about functionality while Switch definitely isn't that. You have laptops with mobile hardware and OS, are you still try to say they are more similar to Switch than to PC!? Again modern mobile phones are multifunctional devices same like PCs, Switch is dedicated console developed on 1st place just for playing games. If you relly fail to see that, I cant relly help you.

If you dont have good argumenst there is no need for insults. But reality is in practical way there will not be any change with 1080p display if games still runing at 720p.

You do realise that Overwatch use extra Pro power and hardware in order to downsample 4k to 1080p!? I don't see how that can be comparible with Switch in portable mode when there is just one Switch power than can be used in portable mode, and that power is meant to be used for 720p games in portable mode. Ask yourself, why there is on basic PS4 console games that are downsampled to 1080p, there all native resolution games whitou donwsampling, while downsampling is only on Pro.

No. I am talking about the Hardware, Form Factor and Software.

The switch is more closely related to a Phone than a PC. That's a fundamental fact. The "functionality" is irrellevent.

Laptop Hardware is derived from Desktop PC hardware. They tend to use x86 processor for starters.
Laptops also tend to use Desktop OS's. Like Windows and Linux.

Ergo. Laptops have less in common with a phone than the Switch.

Rubbish. Last generation a ton of games were upscaled to 720P and 1080P on the Xbox 360 and Playstation 3 and the games looked better for it.

If you are unable to understand the fact that upscaling brings some inherent benefits, then you should probably do some research on upscaling. 

In-fact screw it. I'll prove it.
Here you go.

Case closed and we can move on.

No it doesn't.
Again. Proof? Here it is.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2016-what-does-the-overwatch-ps4-pro-patch-actually-do

Overwatch is native 1080P on the Playstation 4 Pro. The User Interface is 4k.

I wasn't targeting any insults at you specifically. I was targeting it at the statement.

But that's a point, I only talking about functionality and possibilities, and from standpoint of possibilities and functionality today phones are mini PCs that can be used for lotsa staffs staffs outside of gaming same like PC, and thats why its not important at all that games doesn't work on native resolution on phones. While Switch is dedicated gaming device made just for games on 1st place, and you don't need 1080p screen if games are running at 720p.

More and more laptops are using mobile hardware and chips, and that actually doesn't really matters at all, point is that laptops are smaller PCs while todays phones are Mini PCs in terms of possibilities and functionalities.

I really don't see what exactly you proved me with this picture!? Do we have some game on PS3 that runs on 1080p but actually it's downsampled to 720p, or like we have on Pro running at 4k actually downsampled to 1080p for 1080p users!? Of Course not.

Again you missing a point, for that 4k interface they used extra Pro power and capabilities, that couldn't be done with base PS4. That offcourse means that with stronger hardware you can do more than you can do with basic, that goes for PS4 Pro compared to basic PS4, New 3DS compared to 3DS, and same goes for Switch in docked mode compared to Switch in portable mode, but that doesn't have anything with Switch in portable mode and with 720p vs 1080p resolution screen on Switch.

Let me guess, an LG 29" FreeSync monitor? LG 29UM68?

I don't think I'll ever use my Switch in docked mode anyways. 

I'm all for a higher resolution as long as there is little to no sacrifice when given the choice, but 720p hasn't be a problem for when given no choice.  Of course for me, this is on a 1080p screen.  So I cannot vouch for the quality (or lack thereof) on a 4k screen.

So you buy a 2k/4k TV and suddlenly your 1080p games/movies look blurry as hell?

What a disgrace of TV then lmao! I'm not buying one anytime soon.

This resolution fever is downright pathetic honestly, Big TVs are not made to be played at 20cm of them as people seems to do, soon we are gonna be paying for 16k Tvs and claiming that 8k looks too blurry, it's nuts.

Close enough. 29UM58 :D