rjason12 said:
Barkley said:
It's not that I want less competition, I just don't want to be forced to buy inferior hardware that I don't like to play games I do.
I basically have to pay $300 for something I don't want, to have the privilege of spending $60 on something I do.
|
Have you ever thought that maybe people think the same exact way about PlayStation or Xbox? Maybe I don't want to pay 400$ for something I don't want (or even if it's cheaper). I mean if you don't want to buy "inferior hardware" then go PC, because the other two are outdated almost as soon as they are released. People are acting like the Switch is super "inferior" when the hardware is like comparing apples to oranges.
|
Yeah there's people that do, but judging by hardware sales it's no where near as many, regardless I was talking about my personal opinion.
I prefer console gaming for a variety of reasons, and for the price the power you recieve from ps4/xbo is cost effective. Switch isn't even close. As for apples and oranges... well hardware isn't that difficult to compare, the features you can't compare such as portability, hd rumble and the weird IR rock paper scissors tech I don't really care for.
Switch is underpowered hardware with many features I don't care for, I don't want it. But If the must-have games come I'll have to buy one, with a bitter taste in my mouth.