This justifies pretty much every war there ever was. But yes, you're obviously an anarchist, in which case I see where you're coming from.

He's talking about Poland. It was part of eastern bloc, but not Soviet Union. 

Secondly, what does Putin and Russia have to do with it? 

1. Yes.

2. The most famous Polish journalist in USA, Max Kolonko emigrated to USA in 80's if I remember correctly. . He has uplodaded a video where he is talking about his migration and well - no guns'bullets involved. The socialist party in SocDems Block coutries ( dont mistake SocDem coutries with USSR ) were divided, and they have changed their politics as often as westenr goverment does. Or maybe are u talking about Berlin Wall ? It is another story. 

3. U could travel in Soc Bloc freely.Other countries - visa.

And yes, the lack of democratic elections had put the CCPR to the grave. 

4. Im not talking about Russia, im talking about my country Poland and guess what - my grandmother, who has ended her carrer in PRL decided to take " commy" pension because commies count it like 70% more than "liberals". BTW, about your freedom " Merkel is a bitch ". Well, i dont need this freedom at all.

Her pension is like 2400, the expected pension of mine is like 900. So much of my freedom with no money to survive. We had a super strong post-communist parties after Soviet fall ( Aleksander Kwaśniewski - elected 2 times etc )

Dont even try to tell me that anything has improved in our economy after Soviet falls. We are just more "competetive" because we make 40% less money. That's all.

Nah, that's not really a mess, although I don't really agree with it either. Thanks to your post, I just realized that in some cases, starting a war to gain independence could probably be a sensible thing (although I'm not entirely sure such a sensible war has ever been fought). But that still didn't convince me a war between nations ever makes sense. I mean, waging war for power sure makes sense (at least if the odds are in your favour), but that hardly is an acceptable reason, which is probably what I was actually looking for.

Of course, if we talk about " average Joe" there is no and never will be any reason to war. So why the hell humankind's history is driven by wars ? Because every country is losing or gaining power and this is impossible to always keep a balance to satisty everybody. Even China, who has the world most peaceful culture is now messing up with Vietnam sea etc. Simple because Chinese people want to be rich as European are. Sadly, in China alone u got 2x more people than EU+USA. If u want to make all people as rich as " rich" people are, u need kinda like 8x the Earth's resources.

Anarchist ? Who knows. I just tells it like it is. Every dominant coutry always try to impose it's agenda on others,weaker countries since 2000 BC.

Poland is an outlier in my argument. There was never any doubt as to where they stand. As for the rest, I hope I have the time to respond today, or at all. It will be a PROJECT. :)

It's a little more complicated than that. Historically, countries haven't even existed the way you consider them today. You had kingdoms or city states, that typically had the capital or monarch to run it. Wars depended on the rulers hunger for power, but also army needed to be funded somehow, which was to attack and rob someone. As generals had lots of power on the army, the had to have something to do to prevent the generals from going into rebellion.

When we talk about "country", it's typically considered a unit that belongs to and is ruled by it's people. This is why nationalism ended the British empire, and why you sometimes see people saying USA isn't a country, for example. Nationalism and democracy go usually hand in hand, and when the people gets to decide, they don't go into war, because it's the people who's asses are on the line.

That's only partially true. Esentially you're talking about imperialism. Two nationalists next to each other are pretty much happy with border between the two.

Of course, but every monarch have to gain his society aprrovement for rulling - if not, he is simple killed by his own people and replaced with another monarch. Another monarch " will solve the problems ".

Do u know what Damocles Sword is ?

Roman Emperors  created all those Circus for a reason.

City states ? Ancient Grecce was full of city-states and guess what - endless wars from the beginning to an end. The end of Ancient Grecce was done by Philip, the father of Alexander the great - he simply conquer all of the those city states at once.

 A democratic politic may not be elected in next election -  a monarch will be killed.

Also, one big thing that u miss here - everybody is happy at the beginning of war. Everybody is sure that this war will be a" easy ride " and we " finally will teach those bitches a lesson ".

This. What the hell is wrong with people? How was everyone so oblivious to how bad things were getting with US-Russian relations? Imminent nuclear war with US was the top news story in Russia (and some other European countries) for a couple weeks in October but the whole time the US population was completely oblivious because the media refused to report on it as obviously no one would vote for a world war (aka Hillary, at least that is what Russian officials claimed would happen if Hillary was elected). Russia was approving programs to provide rations for fallout shelters in Moscow, they were calling for family to return home and they had a nuclear war training program with 40 million people. This is why Russia likes Trump, cause he was the most likely way to avoid "Doomsday".

Like you said the clock should have been set back.  4 years of Trump changing EPA policies is no where near as damaging as Obama returning us to cold war level relations with Russia (Obama violated the agreement that ended the cold war last year). 

Doomsday clock is having a world war between America and Russia.

So no we aren't anywhere near that.