By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Switch Graphics! Don’t give up on them just yet.

Pemalite on 18 January 2017
sc94597 said:
daredevil.shark said:
It's still behind a lot.

That is because the Switch game is a port of the Vita version. Lazy/cost reducing ports don't show much.

Is there a confirmation of this anywhere?
Keen to see how it stacks up against the Playstation 3 version.



--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--

Around the Network
sc94597 on 18 January 2017
Pemalite said:
sc94597 said:

That is because the Switch game is a port of the Vita version. Lazy/cost reducing ports don't show much.

Is there a confirmation of this anywhere?

Keen to see how it stacks up against the Playstation 3 version.

Some one posted this comparison on this thread in Neogaf. You can read the thread for more details about why they think it is a Vita port.

 

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1335064
PS4

Switch

 

Vita and PS3

 

It makes sense to use the Vita as a template considering the CPU archtecture. Since it is a launch game, I have a feeling they wanted to get it done quickly, and could've done better if they had more time.



dahuman on 18 January 2017
sc94597 said:
Pemalite said:

Is there a confirmation of this anywhere?

Keen to see how it stacks up against the Playstation 3 version.

Some one posted this comparison on this thread in Neogaf. You can read the thread for more details about why they think it is a Vita port.

 

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1335064
PS4

Switch

 

Vita and PS3

 

It makes sense to use the Vita as a template considering the CPU archtecture. Since it is a launch game, I have a feeling they wanted to get it done quickly, and could've done better if they had more time.

Fucking SE lol



Pemalite on 18 January 2017
sc94597 said:
Pemalite said:

Is there a confirmation of this anywhere?

Keen to see how it stacks up against the Playstation 3 version.

Some one posted this comparison on this thread in Neogaf. You can read the thread for more details about why they think it is a Vita port.

 

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1335064
PS4

 

<SNIP>

It makes sense to use the Vita as a template considering the CPU archtecture. Since it is a launch game, I have a feeling they wanted to get it done quickly, and could've done better if they had more time.


Difference between the Switch and the Playstation 3 doesn't seem to be as big.

Still. It is expected that ports won't allow for the Switch's hardware to shine, but it does give us a baseline in expected image quality even at this early stage.




--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--

AZWification on 19 January 2017

I' m still hoping for Retro's game to blow me away.



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---

Around the Network
FunFan on 19 January 2017
AZWification said:

I' m still hoping for Retro's game to blow me away.

have faith, brother. But there already quite a few big games this year. Retro should tke its time.



“Simple minds have always confused great honesty with great rudeness.” - Sherlock Holmes, Elementary (2013).

"Did you guys expected some actual rational fact-based reasoning? ...you should already know I'm all about BS and fraudulence." - FunFan, VGchartz (2016)