Wasn't the main joke for 2 years about the PS4 that it had no games? 

 I can play most of PS4's games on my PC, can't do that with Nintendo games.

The WiiU sold out in the beginning as well, but after all the super hard core Nintendo fans got their console, sales died down, and never really picked up again. So that's a faulty metric to discern how the masses recieved the Switch. I highly doubt that there will be a lot of none-Nintendo core fans getting the Switch the first week or two, after that, we'll see what the masses thinks of the Switch, if they even knows it exists. I think that half the Nintendo fans are loving the Switch, and have pre-ordered it, and the other half is bitching about it, but half of those still have pre-ordered it as well.

Who knows why Nintendo is doing what they're doing? I'm not even sure Nintendo nows half the time. They've shown time and time again that they're not interested in delivering services that most people take for granted these days.

I'm making assumtions because Nintendo refused to address them, so it's only natural that we try to fill in the blanks. The ironic thing is, that you made an assumption in that last sentence. I'm probably going to buy the Switch one day, but as it is right now, there's still a lot of unknown factors left.

Itallic: got ported to PS4, further enhencing my argument of PS3 games being ported to the PS4

Yes sure, but still its better then doing it then delaying a game (zelda) to release on both console or even movin a whole big project that was already confirmed for the wii u (retros game, next 3d mario) completly to the new console. 

You're seriously gonna list 6 (SIX) games that were PS4 exclusives, when you just complained that the Switch had a meager FIRST year (that's ONE year), and it still had more than Sony's first 2 years? I hope that you can list additional exclusive games for PS4 for the first two years, or else you've just shot yourself in the foot, friend. I refuse to believe that PS4 only got 6 games in its first 2 years. Cannot be possible.

Dont forget that this 6 games (maybe there are even more I dont know) are the exclusives.Third Party (GTA; Assassins Creed, Battlefield) is there as well. And where does Nintendo have more? 3D mario and Xenoblade 2. Maybe Splatoon 2 (which is probl more a port with new maps and gear then a brand new game) but the rest are ports/remastereds as well or just smaller titles (like Bomberman, 1,2 Switch). Maybe we can count Arms in as well. So its not really "more".

Available on XboxOne as well (So? You still cant play it on your PC. Zelda is on Wii U as well, Mario Kart is, even Splatoon kind of is)

inFamous Second Son Didn't it get the worst review score out of all the three games? Was still a decent game with great graphics for a launch window title

Gran Turismo Sport Is this the next main line GT games, or a spinn off? More a spinoff. Not to bad IMO, the last entries in the series werent that great, so i apprectiate doing something new with a spin off. It has VR support as well.

Farpoint VR games isn't much of a game; they're more "experiences" than anything else right now. $60 for a 40 minute game? No thanks Which VR game is 60$ and lasts 40 minutes? Farpoint is planned to last 4-6 hour. Price is not announced yet.

Crash Bandicoot N'Sane Collection More ports of old games No Ports, remakes. From Scratch. 

Driveclub There's a ton of racing sims out there Its an arcade racer not a sim. And it has the best graphics on any racing game right now (even compared to PC)

Detroid: Become Human Cool if you like walking simulations ;) or interactive movies Some people do, its always nice to have diverstiy

Bloodborne Dark Souls 2.5, right? How is this Dark Souls 2,5 but you consider something like Splatoon 2 as a new game? Bloodborne was amde by a complte different development team then Dark Souls 2 and has different combat system (no shields etc.), different setting, different character and so on

Killzone Shadowfall Developed by the same devs as Horizon, and sits on a 73 metascore... Yeah and Star Fox Zero has a 69, Paper Mario CS 76. Not every exclusive game is 80+. Doesnt mean its not fun playing.

Problem is, you didn't list only exclusives. But you're right, the Switch probably won't get as many AA-AAA "exclusives", but they'll get a ton of exclusives nonetheless, and not "semi-exclusives". Give it 3 years and we can compare which console had the better games at the same tiome in its respective life span.

Its not only about exclusives. You still have all the third party games (Witcher, GTA, Mass Effect and so on) on Ps4 as well. Overall if somebody wants to pick up 1 console, nobody can denie that the PS4 will very likely be the cheaper and just better option in almost every case.

And if your looking for a handheld, I think the 2ds/3ds for 100 bucks is also the better choice, at least for 2017.

Both the doom squad and the euphoria team need to take a couple of steps back and breathe slowly and lower their pulse a little until we know even more (which it's high time for, so many unanswered questions only a few weeks before launch is unacceptable). The presentation may have won over the die-hard's, but to think that the majority of gamers, not to mention "casuals", are terribly excited at this point is completely unfounded. Even the ones praising it are citing the same issues, these being price and support, first and foremost, so to think that these issues won't cause any problems is downright ludicrous at this point.

I think it was that Batman VR game That last 1 hour, had replay value with new puzzles and was 20$. LOL! Really?! I either heard of another game or my memory is all fucked up :P

So it looks better than a PC game on ultra high setting? On hardware that's been critizised for being outdated even before it launched? That would make game devs extremely lazy for not making a PC game that looks better.

Well decide yourself I guess

Start 0:41

I'm sorry, I can't really be bothered since I'm not THAT interested =) I hope you enjoy it

Like I said before, having a Switch and a PC covers ALL your bases, even more so than having a PS4 and PC; you cannot get Nintendo like games anywhere else than from a Nintendo console. But I agree that Nintendo needs to get their 3rd party shit together. A PS4 will be cheaper, but it won't be a better option. With the Switch you get the portability of AAA games AND Nintendo's games.

I dont think so. Not just games whise. The Ps4 has more games not available on PC then Nintendo consoles had in the past.

Also if you a pc gamer you probl care about graphics and so will like the ps4 better.

The portability is the only reason to pick the switch.

No, the major selling point of the Switch are Nintendo's games, the portability is just a nice bonus. I don't really care about graphics, that's not why I game on PC, it's because of its exclusives - especially the strategy games, and I get all the multiplats I need. Let's see how many Switch games compared to PS4 games that doesn't end up on the PC, and which of those are worthwhile.

Like I said prior, the first years switch might look better then the first year Ps4, I agree. But that has reasons (PS3 games werent moved to Ps4 but Wii U games were moved to Switch). All in all i prefer sonys tactics to keep support on their old console even if a new one arrives and have some droughts on their new one.

I absolutely agree that SOny does a far better job of supporting their consoles in the long run, but I gotta say that Nintendo is handeling the 3DS's retirement pretty well right now.