By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Website Topics - The Moderator Thread

AngryLittleAlchemist on 19 August 2017
NintendoPie said:
AngryLittleAlchemist said:

What and who is this about? i need this user drama 

It's possible to not realize what this is about? I quoted a post directly mentioning the user in question, on top of the fact that 60% of this thread is about him/has him in it.

I don't know what page to start on, so yeah



Around the Network
COKTOE on 19 August 2017
AngryLittleAlchemist said:
NintendoPie said:

It's possible to not realize what this is about? I quoted a post directly mentioning the user in question, on top of the fact that 60% of this thread is about him/has him in it.

I don't know what page to start on, so yeah

Kerotan. The Frog Avatar. Likes Playstation. A lot.



- "If you have the heart of a true winner, you can always get more pissed off than some other asshole."

AngryLittleAlchemist on 19 August 2017
COKTOE said:
AngryLittleAlchemist said:

I don't know what page to start on, so yeah

Kerotan. The Frog Avatar. Likes Playstation. A lot.

Oh okay. The guy with the mario hat frog? Woah I've nevers seen him post anything toxic before.



COKTOE on 19 August 2017
AngryLittleAlchemist said:
COKTOE said:

Kerotan. The Frog Avatar. Likes Playstation. A lot.

Oh okay. The guy with the mario hat frog? Woah I've nevers seen him post anything toxic before.

Yep, that's that guy. I've enjoyed talking to him about MMA a little bit, and he's on my friends list, but he gets in trouble quite a lot. There was some deliberation going on as to whether his most recent ban was perhaps too harsh. That's the gist of it.



- "If you have the heart of a true winner, you can always get more pissed off than some other asshole."

AngryLittleAlchemist on 19 August 2017
COKTOE said:
AngryLittleAlchemist said:

Oh okay. The guy with the mario hat frog? Woah I've nevers seen him post anything toxic before.

Yep, that's that guy. I've enjoyed talking to him about MMA a little bit, and he's on my friends list, but he gets in trouble quite a lot. There was some deliberation going on as to whether his most recent ban was perhaps too harsh. That's the gist of it.

Ok, I just caught up by reading StarDoor's list. LOL



Around the Network
tbone51 on 19 August 2017

Can we all get along? Jk aside this is getting crazy!



Pyro as Bill on 19 August 2017

If we make a joke/sarcastic remark in response to someone's unjustifiable positivity will we get moderated/banned?



Nov 2016 - NES outsells PS1 (JP)

Don't Play Stationary 4 ever. Switch!

monocle_layton on 19 August 2017
Aeolus451 said:
AngryLittleAlchemist said:

What and who is this about? i need this user drama 

Your profile pic is a perfect reflection of myself when I wake up to find new political threads going around....

This is much more fitting



Aeolus451 on 20 August 2017
RolStoppable said:
Aeolus451 said:

No, I just disagree with the grounds you're using to justify it. If the mods are using that same grounds then they are wrong. People need to learn how to be able to tolerate things or people they don't like.

That's such nonsense. In that case the forums wouldn't need a mod team to begin with.

What are you talking about? There's still the reg rules so the mods would be needed. You just want to be able to get people moderated for being annoying when they don't break rules. 



Aeolus451 on 20 August 2017
RolStoppable said:
Aeolus451 said:

What are you talking about? There's still the reg rules so the mods would be needed. You just want to be able to get people moderated for being annoying when they don't break rules. 

Your statement was so broad that it could be applied to anything. I think the overall issue here is that you draw the line at different points. You aren't opposed to getting people moderated for being annoying when they don't break any rules, because you already wrote a long post about it:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8530902

The reason why you don't see an issue with what Kerotan does is because he doesn't attack anything you like. It is as simple as that: A double standard. The alternative is that you are still ignorant of Kerotan's overall contributions to discussions.

One method to get more clarity for your stance on this subject is to ask you what you think of Lawlight's posting history. Do you see an issue with it or should other people grow a thicker skin and learn to tolerate?

Do you not understand the difference between someone being irritating and someone trolling/attacking others? I guess not because you believe that being annoying is trolling.

I made it perfectly clear that in that post you linked and in my other posts that I draw the line on people attacking eachother directly or indirectly. There's no double standard. You're just being rol by intentionally missing a point you don't want to address. I deal with plenty of people on this forum that bash trump whenever they can who actually attack my character alot by using the methods I mentioned in that post. i still think the same with that about attacking others directly or indirectly. If they just want to bash trump, that's fine. If I can handle that then you should be able to handle a little frog wanting to debate with ya guys over video game sales. If someone is being annoying by being overly excited or being annoying (without breaking any rules), just suck it up and deal with it like a mature adult. 

Of course, I'm not familiar with the entirety of lawlight's posting history. I'm not a mod with access to his moderations or a stalker. He's been here a long time so I'll apply this rule of thumb for his posting history in a broad sense since you asked it in that way. If he didn't attack someone directly/indirectly, I don't care. If you want to link specific instances or posts to see what I think on it instead of bringing up a user's posting history without referencing anything speciific, then have at it.