VGPolyglot said:
Confirm the reasons for the ban, if it was really someone who didn't break any rules, but was moderated because he "should be moderated".
|
He was moderated for being purposefully obtuse and annoying with people in the thread. Instead of debating with people and listening to arguments and responding in kind, he dismissed anything anyone said and moved goalposts, often simply ignoring the points they were making. Here's the mod note I left on his profile -
"With the discussion in this thread and your general thick-headedness with people and your refusal to understand the point I'm making, I'm pretty sure you're just trolling and I'm gonna get rid of you for 3 days. It's further solidified by your discussion with CGI-Quality and your earlier discussion with RolStoppable. You have a habit of ignoring the point people are making and trying to twist things into your own warped reality. Moving the goalposts, ignoring other peoples points and trying your absolute best to be annoying. On top of all that, you provide no evidence for your claims. Feel free to complain about it on your return."
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=234000&page=1
Feel free to read through the thread and see his interactions with people.
quickrick said:
No mod ever gave me a warning for trolling before the ban.
|
I didn't have to give you a warning. You've been here for less than 3 Months and I am free to bypass the Warning rule if I see fit.
quickrick said:
In regard's to flaming. that comment about about he was the one kid that who didn't understand why idiots were allowed to run free, was obviously a personal insult toward me, that's why i posted that.
|
That one specifically wasn't towards you, but I can understand how you'd think it was.
Kerotan said:
This is another case of what Rol was getting at where the instigator gets away without punishment.
|
Go back and read that thread and see the part where I'm contemplating moderating people for being annoying.