By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
quickrick said:
Carl2291 said:

I was that one kid who didn't understand why idiots were allowed to run free.

 

CGI-Quality said:

You can be Banned without a Warning, depending on the severity of the offense and the history. You were banned for Trolling (and could have even been Banned for Flaming).

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8687157 

In regard's to flaming. that comment about about he was the one kid that who didn't understand why idiots were allowed to run free, was obviously a personal insult toward me, that's why i posted that.   

If you felt attacked, then you should have reported him. I don't like Carl's near-trollish way of handling things, either, but that doesn't give you license to troll back.



Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:

www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames

Around the Network
quickrick said:
Carl2291 said:

I was that one kid who didn't understand why idiots were allowed to run free.

 

CGI-Quality said:

You can be Banned without a Warning, depending on the severity of the offense and the history. You were banned for Trolling (and could have even been Banned for Flaming).

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8687157 

In regard's to flaming. that comment about about he was the one kid that who didn't understand why idiots were allowed to run free, was obviously a personal insult toward me, that's why i posted that.   

This is another case of what Rol was getting at where the instigator gets away without punishment. 



VGPolyglot said:

Confirm the reasons for the ban, if it was really someone who didn't break any rules, but was moderated because he "should be moderated".

He was moderated for being purposefully obtuse and annoying with people in the thread. Instead of debating with people and listening to arguments and responding in kind, he dismissed anything anyone said and moved goalposts, often simply ignoring the points they were making. Here's the mod note I left on his profile -

"With the discussion in this thread and your general thick-headedness with people and your refusal to understand the point I'm making, I'm pretty sure you're just trolling and I'm gonna get rid of you for 3 days. It's further solidified by your discussion with CGI-Quality and your earlier discussion with RolStoppable. You have a habit of ignoring the point people are making and trying to twist things into your own warped reality. Moving the goalposts, ignoring other peoples points and trying your absolute best to be annoying. On top of all that, you provide no evidence for your claims. Feel free to complain about it on your return."

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=234000&page=1

Feel free to read through the thread and see his interactions with people.

quickrick said: 

No mod ever gave me a warning for trolling before the ban.

I didn't have to give you a warning. You've been here for less than 3 Months and I am free to bypass the Warning rule if I see fit.

quickrick said: 

In regard's to flaming. that comment about about he was the one kid that who didn't understand why idiots were allowed to run free, was obviously a personal insult toward me, that's why i posted that.   

That one specifically wasn't towards you, but I can understand how you'd think it was.

Kerotan said: 

This is another case of what Rol was getting at where the instigator gets away without punishment. 

Go back and read that thread and see the part where I'm contemplating moderating people for being annoying.



                            

Carl2291 said:
VGPolyglot said:

Confirm the reasons for the ban, if it was really someone who didn't break any rules, but was moderated because he "should be moderated".

He was moderated for being purposefully obtuse and annoying with people in the thread. Instead of debating with people and listening to arguments and responding in kind, he dismissed anything anyone said and moved goalposts, often simply ignoring the points they were making. Here's the mod note I left on his profile -

"With the discussion in this thread and your general thick-headedness with people and your refusal to understand the point I'm making, I'm pretty sure you're just trolling and I'm gonna get rid of you for 3 days. It's further solidified by your discussion with CGI-Quality and your earlier discussion with RolStoppable. You have a habit of ignoring the point people are making and trying to twist things into your own warped reality. Moving the goalposts, ignoring other peoples points and trying your absolute best to be annoying. On top of all that, you provide no evidence for your claims. Feel free to complain about it on your return."

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=234000&page=1

Feel free to read through the thread and see his interactions with people.

quickrick said: 

No mod ever gave me a warning for trolling before the ban.

I didn't have to give you a warning. You've been here for less than 3 Months and I am free to bypass the Warning rule if I see fit.

quickrick said: 

In regard's to flaming. that comment about about he was the one kid that who didn't understand why idiots were allowed to run free, was obviously a personal insult toward me, that's why i posted that.   

That one specifically wasn't towards you, but I can understand how you'd think it was.

Kerotan said: 

This is another case of what Rol was getting at where the instigator gets away without punishment. 

Go back and read that thread and see the part where I'm contemplating moderating people for being annoying.

Ok if that comment wasn't towards me, then  i have no problem with you. i'm not in agreement about seeing people's point, because people don't see my point, this is about the future, and there are no facts till it happens. there is data that showing that switch will keep doing great, but that doesn't mean it will happen. I don't have to keep repeating the same argument though especially with the way switch is selling now, so i can see the reason for the reason the ban

Last edited by quickrick - on 17 January 2018

Carl2291 said:
VGPolyglot said:

Confirm the reasons for the ban, if it was really someone who didn't break any rules, but was moderated because he "should be moderated".

He was moderated for being purposefully obtuse and annoying with people in the thread. Instead of debating with people and listening to arguments and responding in kind, he dismissed anything anyone said and moved goalposts, often simply ignoring the points they were making. Here's the mod note I left on his profile -

"With the discussion in this thread and your general thick-headedness with people and your refusal to understand the point I'm making, I'm pretty sure you're just trolling and I'm gonna get rid of you for 3 days. It's further solidified by your discussion with CGI-Quality and your earlier discussion with RolStoppable. You have a habit of ignoring the point people are making and trying to twist things into your own warped reality. Moving the goalposts, ignoring other peoples points and trying your absolute best to be annoying. On top of all that, you provide no evidence for your claims. Feel free to complain about it on your return."

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=234000&page=1

Feel free to read through the thread and see his interactions with people.

quickrick said: 

No mod ever gave me a warning for trolling before the ban.

I didn't have to give you a warning. You've been here for less than 3 Months and I am free to bypass the Warning rule if I see fit.

quickrick said: 

In regard's to flaming. that comment about about he was the one kid that who didn't understand why idiots were allowed to run free, was obviously a personal insult toward me, that's why i posted that.   

That one specifically wasn't towards you, but I can understand how you'd think it was.

Kerotan said: 

This is another case of what Rol was getting at where the instigator gets away without punishment. 

Go back and read that thread and see the part where I'm contemplating moderating people for being annoying.

I won't get involved anymore in this as it's between him and you but I must highlight something. And this is a big flaw in the system. An inconsistenty. 

 

"He was moderated for being purposefully obtuse and annoying with people in the thread. Instead of debating with people and listening to arguments and responding in kind, he dismissed anything anyone said and moved goalposts, often simply ignoring the points they were making. "

 

So basically this is exactly what miyamotoo was doing for weeks when we were discussing why the ps4 was down in Japan Q4 in 2017 vs 2016. I reported him countless times highlighting this fact yet no action was ever taken. The mod team didn't even tell him to cop on. In the end I took my frustrations out on him and got moderated. 

 

This is exactly what Rol was saying. The instigator goes unpunished. And it wasn't just me he did it to. NoCtiS_NoX wasted a lot of time trying to debate with him only for him to use the same shameless tactic. 

 

So why does quickrick get punished now but miyamotoo didn't a few weeks ago? 

 



Around the Network
Kerotan said:

I won't get involved anymore in this as it's between him and you but I must highlight something. And this is a big flaw in the system. An inconsistenty. 

"He was moderated for being purposefully obtuse and annoying with people in the thread. Instead of debating with people and listening to arguments and responding in kind, he dismissed anything anyone said and moved goalposts, often simply ignoring the points they were making. "

So basically this is exactly what miyamotoo was doing for weeks when we were discussing why the ps4 was down in Japan Q4 in 2017 vs 2016. I reported him countless times highlighting this fact yet no action was ever taken. The mod team didn't even tell him to cop on. In the end I took my frustrations out on him and got moderated. 

This is exactly what Rol was saying. The instigator goes unpunished. And it wasn't just me he did it to. NoCtiS_NoX wasted a lot of time trying to debate with him only for him to use the same shameless tactic. 

So why does quickrick get punished now but miyamotoo didn't a few weeks ago? 

I have no idea what you're talking about so I can't answer that, sorry.



                            

Carl2291 said:
Kerotan said:

I won't get involved anymore in this as it's between him and you but I must highlight something. And this is a big flaw in the system. An inconsistenty. 

"He was moderated for being purposefully obtuse and annoying with people in the thread. Instead of debating with people and listening to arguments and responding in kind, he dismissed anything anyone said and moved goalposts, often simply ignoring the points they were making. "

So basically this is exactly what miyamotoo was doing for weeks when we were discussing why the ps4 was down in Japan Q4 in 2017 vs 2016. I reported him countless times highlighting this fact yet no action was ever taken. The mod team didn't even tell him to cop on. In the end I took my frustrations out on him and got moderated. 

This is exactly what Rol was saying. The instigator goes unpunished. And it wasn't just me he did it to. NoCtiS_NoX wasted a lot of time trying to debate with him only for him to use the same shameless tactic. 

So why does quickrick get punished now but miyamotoo didn't a few weeks ago? 

I have no idea what you're talking about so I can't answer that, sorry.

Can some of the other mods? Did my reports just get ignored? 



Rol miyamotoo was purposely ignoring all the facts presented to him so he could keep putting out the same line over and over. You can call that trolling.

He also did it to NoCtiS_NoX and that was bad form. He doesn't like me so you could understand at least he'd have the urge to be annoying and argumentive but doing it to NoCtiS_NoX was very bad form.



RolStoppable said:
Kerotan said:
Rol miyamotoo was purposely ignoring all the facts presented to him so he could keep putting out the same line over and over. You can call that trolling.

He also did it to NoCtiS_NoX and that was bad form. He doesn't like me so you could understand at least he'd have the urge to be annoying and argumentive but doing it to NoCtiS_NoX was very bad form.

Sure, you can call it trolling. But such behavior isn't breaking any rules. That's why it made sense to support Carl's proposal from a couple of weeks ago, because such behavior can be included in instances where the mod team should have the freedom to moderate.

"you can call it trolling" 

 

"but it's not breaking the rules" 

 

Good one. 



Kerotan said:
RolStoppable said:

Sure, you can call it trolling. But such behavior isn't breaking any rules. That's why it made sense to support Carl's proposal from a couple of weeks ago, because such behavior can be included in instances where the mod team should have the freedom to moderate.

"you can call it trolling" 

 

"but it's not breaking the rules" 

 

Good one. 

I wont even waste my time with rol, if you don't think switch will do over 100 million, you are a troll to him, and wants to see the person banned, he thinks everything he says is fact, take things way to personal.

Last edited by quickrick - on 17 January 2018