By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Will the Scorpio own the PS4Pro in EVERY hardware category?

REDZONE said:
Azzanation said:
I wont be surprised. Xbox has always delivered more powerful hardware than Sony, give or take most cases they release there consoles later. Only exception is the launch XB1.

XBOX > PS2
360 > PS3 (Majority of 3rd Party games ran better on 360)
PS4 > XB1
SCO > PRO

MS do well when it comes to competing with Power.

Lol wut?MS had one console more powerful than Sony it was the OG Xbox and that was because it came 4 years later.Xbox 360>PS3?Lol no.It was hard to program for but First party exclusives spoke.The cell was a beast.It did had more ram tho.

I was just about tell him that the PS3 was "technically" stronger than the 360. So now that only leaves the OG Xbox and Scorpio. They're pretty much tied in the power department with the consoles. Then again, it's not all that surprising that he said that.

On topic, I think Scorpio will definitely have the advantage in most aspects. However, it's gonna come down to games and pricing. So far, Xbox doesn't look like it's beating PlayStation in the games department. I hope the price is competitive though. I'm definitely getting one later this year on launch day.



PSN ID- RayCrocheron82

XBL Gamertag- RAFIE82

NNID- RAFIE82/ Friend Code: SW-6006-2580-8237

YouTube- Rafie Crocheron

Around the Network
JRPGfan said:
DirtyP2002 said:

Do you think there will be a hardware aspect in which the Scorpio won't significantly outperform the PS4 Pro?

The price.

PS4pro will be 349$, when the Xbox Scorpio is 449$ or 499$.

The question is simply just a matter of, if people are willing to pay 100$-150$ more to get a scorpio?

I think Sony plan is to fight them with exclusives. ei. Games,games,games.... and cheaper price.

Does price count as a "hardware category" 

It feels like its more of Financial, like profit and stuff. 



Pocky Lover Boy! 

Azzanation said:
REDZONE said:

Lol wut?MS had one console more powerful than Sony it was the OG Xbox and that was because it came 4 years later.Xbox 360>PS3?Lol no.It was hard to program for but First party exclusives spoke.The cell was a beast.It did had more ram tho.

How can you compare 1st party games? Different focuses in game design. I can bet you if PS exclusives crossed over to 360 it would run them better. Sony made a powerful system with so many bottlenecks it turned out worse.

If majority of 3rd party games ran better on the 360 than most likely it would run there 1st party games too. So yes 360 was a much better well balanced system than the PS3 and it was outperforming it on more occasions.

....and you know that how?! The point is that the PS3 was technically stronger than the 360 overall. Regardless of developers had difficulty with the cell. That's the only reason why multiplats were designed on the 360 and then ported. Of course multiplats will run better on 360 since it was the console it was developed on. 1st party games on PS3 games utilized it's architecture and power. That's why from a technical standpoint, it appeared as though PS3 first party games looked better than 360's first party games.



PSN ID- RayCrocheron82

XBL Gamertag- RAFIE82

NNID- RAFIE82/ Friend Code: SW-6006-2580-8237

YouTube- Rafie Crocheron

Hopefully it installs games faster than XB1.



There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'

Azzanation said:
REDZONE said:

Lol wut?MS had one console more powerful than Sony it was the OG Xbox and that was because it came 4 years later.Xbox 360>PS3?Lol no.It was hard to program for but First party exclusives spoke.The cell was a beast.It did had more ram tho.

How can you compare 1st party games? Different focuses in game design. I can bet you if PS exclusives crossed over to 360 it would run them better. Sony made a powerful system with so many bottlenecks it turned out worse.

If majority of 3rd party games ran better on the 360 than most likely it would run there 1st party games too. So yes 360 was a much better well balanced system than the PS3 and it was outperforming it on more occasions. Thats a fact not a opinion.

Then howcome PS3 exclusives looked vastly superior to 360 exclusives?

Are Microsofts devs just incompetent? 

No, raw numbers tell you it is more powerful. How are you arguing this? I might as well try to argue the PS4Pro will be more Powerful than Scorpio despite what the number say.



There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'

Around the Network
ArchangelMadzz said:
Hopefully it installs games faster than XB1.

Installs take the same amount of time on both consoles - the time that you need to copy several of GB from a bluray drive to a disk. PS4 let's you play early, though, although not everything is copied to the disk.



walsufnir said:
ArchangelMadzz said:
Hopefully it installs games faster than XB1.

Installs take the same amount of time on both consoles - the time that you need to copy several of GB from a bluray drive to a disk. PS4 let's you play early, though, although not everything is copied to the disk.

Hopefully you can play the games as quickly as you can on PS4 after putting the disk in the first time* 



There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'

Rafie said:
Azzanation said:

How can you compare 1st party games? Different focuses in game design. I can bet you if PS exclusives crossed over to 360 it would run them better. Sony made a powerful system with so many bottlenecks it turned out worse.

If majority of 3rd party games ran better on the 360 than most likely it would run there 1st party games too. So yes 360 was a much better well balanced system than the PS3 and it was outperforming it on more occasions.

....and you know that how?! The point is that the PS3 was technically stronger than the 360 overall. Regardless of developers had difficulty with the cell. That's the only reason why multiplats were designed on the 360 and then ported. Of course multiplats will run better on 360 since it was the console it was developed on. 1st party games on PS3 games utilized it's architecture and power. That's why from a technical standpoint, it appeared as though PS3 first party games looked better than 360's first party games.

Same reason how you say it wont run it better.

More proof says it will than it wont. Look at the number of 3rd party games out preforming the PS3 versions.

Anyone can make a powerful console, making it balanced and easy to develope for is another story. Techniquly the PS3 was more powerful than the 360, however reality is it wasnt.

Halo 4 looked better than most 1st party games on PS3 aside from acouple. So that point is not a valid one.

Forza 4 also looked better than GT5 go watch a compare vid.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkjiftFsG6c



claims MS has been pretty open about scorpio....

...lists a bunch of rumors.



ms can't even get their marketing straight about if scorpio will have exclusives or if all games will be required to support xbone. if all games support xbone then who really gives a fuck how much more specs scorpio has compared to ps4 pro,.. it's all in service to a resolution bump to "true 4k" instead of sony's checkerboarding technique. talk about a waste of power.



It won't win Form Factor! Scorpio will be larger than the ps4 pro!