By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Azzanation said:
REDZONE said:

Lol wut?MS had one console more powerful than Sony it was the OG Xbox and that was because it came 4 years later.Xbox 360>PS3?Lol no.It was hard to program for but First party exclusives spoke.The cell was a beast.It did had more ram tho.

How can you compare 1st party games? Different focuses in game design. I can bet you if PS exclusives crossed over to 360 it would run them better. Sony made a powerful system with so many bottlenecks it turned out worse.

If majority of 3rd party games ran better on the 360 than most likely it would run there 1st party games too. So yes 360 was a much better well balanced system than the PS3 and it was outperforming it on more occasions.

....and you know that how?! The point is that the PS3 was technically stronger than the 360 overall. Regardless of developers had difficulty with the cell. That's the only reason why multiplats were designed on the 360 and then ported. Of course multiplats will run better on 360 since it was the console it was developed on. 1st party games on PS3 games utilized it's architecture and power. That's why from a technical standpoint, it appeared as though PS3 first party games looked better than 360's first party games.



PSN ID- RayCrocheron82

XBL Gamertag- RAFIE82

NNID- RAFIE82/ Friend Code: SW-6006-2580-8237

YouTube- Rafie Crocheron