Do it yourself. YOU are trying to prove that there are soo many good PS4 games that can't be played on Xbox One. I don't care either way, since I have both PS4 and XBO.

I would say I've provided far more proof against them sharing 95% of the same library than those that contend.

But also ~ where are these hundreds of bundles located in the list I provided for Sony 

and

Why can we not count arcade games as part of play stations library. And just as importantly, why would we not count those but then count Remasters available on Xbox?

There might be a few bundles or duplicates in the ms or Sony list but not any significant or meaningful number that would have any more than a ~5% impact on the spread. I'm not sure why it should be news OR surprising that there are significantly more titles available on a console that has a 2:1 install base of its closest competitor. 

I didn't go through all of the replies, just a couple of pages; hopefully I'm not repeating something people have already said and discussed to death; nevertheless here are my 2 cents:

I don't really see these 1.5 version consoles being able to play at 4k with a fluid 45~60fps. It's going to take a different generation to see that, and maybe it will be 4k at a constant rate of 30fps. The tech is not mainstream enough to be cost effective for either Microsoft or Sony.

It makes better business sense to wait, but because of competition, a business must be savvy and offer some type of alternative to satisfy the demand; enter the upscale resolution. The 1080p/60fps bar with full bells and whistles needs to be met first, and I think this is what both companies are trying to provide. The rest of the transistor count is just for show.

I did not buy a PS4.5 nor will I buy one. I just went logical on these companies. I'm going to buy what works, and not hand them any more of my money for gimmicks. Its the same thing I did for my TV. I bought the best 1080p 120hz TV for the price (under 1k), and I'm gonna skip the stupid HDR crap and wait for Oled to come down in price.

Don't worry that's all I do on this site, I run into threads without reading anything all the time.

And nooooooo! HDR is really good! It's not stupid at all. T_T

It's important because if you're a gamer who's interested in anything but major western AAA games there's one system that is at an enormous disadvantage when compared to another. 

Wow there are a ton of those Arcade Archive games. Over 60.

But I think you're missing the huge effect some games in this list of over 1,400 PS4 games has on sales. I mean, where would PS4 stand without "Call of Duty Endowment"? Would we have even seen a PS4Pro if not for "Battleborn Open Beta"? What about the "World War Toons" beta? I like "Zombie Campaign DLC", which is listed as its own game but is actually DLC for a different game. You don't think "Uno Trial" added to some of the PS4 sales? Well, I doubt you could say that about "Headset Companion" with a straight face.

Also, if this PS4 list includes these PS2/3 classics you can rebuy for PS4, surely we should include the hundreds of BC games you can buy on the Xbox store that aren't on this list of games? Surely that gets us closer to this 95% number, people.

Really doesn't matter, they've lost this gen regardless.

Yeah, using the stores list of games is a bit silly, especially when there's a perfectly good list on Wikipedia that doesn't include ps2 games, beta's, demo's, arcade etc.

Xbox One - 993

PS4 - 1295

I'm sorry, please don't take it in a wrong way; if you use it all the time, and you love it, please feel free to ignore my opinion. I'm just pretty sure there is not enough content out there to warrant the purchase for me. I mean, our live tv is still brodcasting at 720p here in Southern California. I have to watch Netflix, or a blu-ray to get the most out of my HD tv.

So I'm applying the same logic to consoles. I bought a PS4 thinking it would be "top dog" for 7 years because of the longevity of the PS3. How wrong was I. I don't think the console manufacturers took into account all the physics that game developers were going to pack into the 8th gen games, which makes it harder to meet the 1080p/60fps standard(The Bar). And now that 1.5 8th gen consoles are out, I just don't see the need to buy them. They will not do 4k right, I think they are just a place holder until it becomes cost effective to produce a 4k 30fps console.

For those people buying their first Xbox or PS4, they should totally get the pro or scorpion (whatever the hell they are called). They will be the true versions of the 8th generation console that can play the AAA titles at 1080p/60fps with all the bells and whistles. As for me, I'm going to wait for the OLED. =P

I didn't see a claim of one platform being better than the one, just that the 95% shared library is false... I doubt that even if we remove all duplicates, bundles, remasters, bundles, etc the list would be something like PS4 and Xbox around 1000 total games with 25 exclusives each (that would be the 5% difference equaly distributed)