Egelo said:
RJ_Sizzle said:
The goal shouldn't be NPD "wins" in the first place, it should be having an enticing enough product to sell at all times and be profitable, not just dumping in the loss leader months. Getting more units out there doesn't necessarily equate to success, especially if you had to do a firesale to get the product out there. Phil Spencer recently alluded as to why they're tracking Monthly Active Users now. Running the risk of selling a console with a price cut and multiple giveaways is a huge risk if someone isn't active in the ecosystem.
|
So then wtf do you want ? which is it. What dont you get, they cant compete with PS4 streight up. They have to pick their battles and make sure they wins some.
They need ndp wins to seem relevant, else they get nintendo'd into wiiu like irrelevence.
They do fire sales and id even debate that since the deals between it and PS4 are always quite close. But ill play they do em because for one it really works well for them and two the mass amount of software sales they achieve in the same time. Them sticking to it tells me the attach ratios must be good and worth it else why continue the same losing strategy over and over.
Jan - RE7 Feb - For Honor, HAlo wars 2 (ex) March - Ghost Recon
They are fine, theyget all the big 3rd parties there is always someone active in its ecosystem. Hell you are making it sound like the X1 is the freaking wiiu.
|
Slow down there, Chauncy. This is the goal of every console maker... or frankly, anyone with something to sell. You're hitting the victim mode a little too hard. Coming out on top in NPD is an irrelevant metric, really. It's interesting to talk about on the internet, or if your name is Aaron Greenberg. 2nd place doesn't mean 1st loser. Xbox 360 came out on top in most NPDs last gen, but were still neck in neck wtih PS4 sales worldwide. You don't want to spend the entire gen burning cash to get the product out there when that money could be used elsewhere.
So what's really better in the end, selling more of a product at the cost of a massive revenue loss, or selling less and making a profit? Doing fine is being able to sell the product on its own merits and gradually bringing down the price when it's cost effective, not eating away at revenue to save face for a PR move.