What exactly frustrated you setting up the PSVR? Even a pre-schooler should be able to follow the Quick Start Guide, the big pictures are self-explanatory.

But it is. I don't know how many ways that can be said. It doesn't matter how much it is compared to a TV. It isn't replacing a TV. It's a supplementary device with a limited pool of compatible software being sold at a premium. It is literally the biggest issue.

I said this before and I'll say it again - VR will never be anything more than a niche product until someone can sell it for $200, and that would be for a premium experience. VR will never take off at $400. It doesn't matter if everyone in the world tries and loves it. Normal people aren't going to drop $400 for supplemental tech. There's no way in hell PSVR is reaching 10m by the end of 2017. Not for $400 plus PS Camera plus Move. If it hits 3m by that time, I'd consider it a screaming success. That's abysmal.

Like I said in the post you directly quoted PSVR's sales are an issue of the product, not the tech. Of course VR will be bigger in the future, but not because of a $400 VR headset.

Nope. It will replace TV.

Not in all cases but certainly in most gaming scenarios (portable might stay flat).

Its like Television. The first television hadnt much content either, all stuff were on radio.

Its not even long ago were there were just 3 programs in television that hadnt even send programm 24 hours per day.

And still, TV sell for way more then 200 bucks.

The future will have VR devices  with 4k screens, as sharp as modern fullHD television. Wireless. Smaller and ligher and very comfortable to wear. 

All this is right, but that wont stop VR from beein successfull right now as well.

Television were successful before they went flat and HD as well.

I'm just compiling complaints from other reviews I've read. I personally have no issue hooking it up but I'm just taking into consideration other people's experience with the device. 

First of all, Switch needs to have at least a 1080p screen with a refresh rate of 120hz and rgb pixel arrangment, and tegra is expected to perform at that level with an onboard battery... people are really buying into this!

PS. right now the sweet spot for a vr screen is 1080p 5.7" which is what PSVR is and is helped by RGB, and I assume Switch is 6.6" screen!? not even a rgb pixel arrangement will help with the screen door effect.

You have a lot of faith in Nintendo, yet I'm skeptical about what the hardware can deliver beyond quick pass it around experiences. Longer game sessions rely on a comfortable light weight fit and rock steady tracking. Tbh, psvr doesn't meet those requirements. I don't have a problem with it but I do see the problems.

Rotational gyro drift is real and you need to reset the device every so often. Most of the time it behaves or stays within 10-15 degrees deviation, sometimes it goes really wrong, like when my wife was trying Tethered and ended up having to face backwards on the couch. I've also had races in DC VR ending up sitting sideways to look out the front window. Positional drift depends on the setup, yet in DC VR it only takes a few laps to not be centered behind the wheel anymore or sunk into the seat. A dedicated reset viewpoint button is a must. (hold down options on psvr) So how is Switch going to do that without any external anchoring?

In non cockpit games where you move your head around a lot, the headset will slip, in some game I have to push it back up every few minutes. A heavier device hanging in front of you will make that worse. Text is uncomfortable to read on 1080p headsets, on 720p it will be worse. Yet maybe Nintendo will break tradition and switch to fully voiced games.

Don't get me wrong, I love it, I play it every day and have had 3 hour sessions with the headset on. (Leaving the headband pattern imprinted on my head lol) I'm used to turning the headset off and back on to reset the tracking and have found the sweet spot for the camera and correct ambient light level to get the best results.

Initial impressions are easy, putting the headset on the first time is amazing. Keeping people interested is a much harder challenge. For that it must be easy and comfortable to use long term. I don't see how Switch can provide that. But I love to be proved wrong!

Vive and Occulus only need 90Hz. The Switch screen isn't important if the headset has it's own screen.

What resolution do you think Switch could run StarFox (SNES) at? Assuming 90Hz.

1080p, 1440p, 4K?

If you would have a clue you would understand that PSVR has less SDE but ALSO less Resolution. This is because the PSVR has more subpixels but less Pixels then Oculus or Vive. 

You never tried either Vive or the Rift apparently because if you would have you would be aware of the differences. The Vive has a bigger FOV but less Pixels per Arc and thats due to the difference in the lense. 

I posted about VR already 2013 you can check my post history. I am a VR supporter of the earliest hour (second Wave VR). And was one of the first to be hyped. But not acknowledging VRs problems will not help anyone. The Technology is in its earliest stages. And its better to inform people honestly that there are issues that will bother them. Resolution, Comfort and FOV is one of those things. It has to be improved. 

Clearly the Switch tablet screen is the screen used in the visor and you can see that in the patent images. It's only a 6" tablet marginally larger than many phones and below the 7" tablet size which used to be the minimum. It's a good compromise size between portability and functionality and ideal for a VR visor.

Switch seems capable of delivering last gen gameplay and graphics in VR and I'm more than happy with that. Seems a great introduction to VR and should be ok for VR with all but small children. People seem to be working hard to spin this as a negative but even if you don't love VR like myself it still functions as a home console for tv and a very powerful portable console. The VR feature has taken me from sitting on the fence regarding Switch to a definite buyer almost. I really just need a few good VR games to seal the deal so to speak. In the UK I suspect the £200 price point is the switch without VR visor and the £250 price point includes it.

If Nintendo is indeed going to sell NS VR, they will need a game like wii sports. Or at the very minimum a VR experience with BOTW. Should that exist, then i could see something like 10 millions sales of the NS for the VR se - provided the device sells like 50-60 Mil in that situation. Attach rate of 1/5 in short.