And the North American media did things to get Hillary elected.
And the North American media did things to get Hillary elected.
The USA constantly antagonizes Russia and blames everything on it. But the USA and Russia are birds of a feather in many ways. America has more in common with Russia then probably any other country
Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also

| Soundwave said: Follow the money. |
You've quoted a source and then modified the language to fit your point of view.
They said...
Exxon said its “maximum exposure” to loss from these joint ventures was $1 billion. A spokesman from the company said that the figure represented “potential and not actual” losses.
You said they said
Exxon Mobil in particular had been hard hit as they had business contracts with the Russian government. The sanctions cost them $1 billion at least.
Trump would be pointing at you right now, so dishonest.
I wonder how many real journalists are left in this country? Assange is one that comes to mind...
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/793268442329735168?lang=en


| numberwang said: I wonder how many real journalists are left in this country? Assange is one that comes to mind... https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/793268442329735168?lang=en ![]() ![]() |
Now that's what I call a reliable source. They're clearly unbiased considering everything they have revealed about Trump, unlike them evil leftist media that dare quote him.

If somebody does not like wikileaks he can read the NYT about the Clinton-Russian-Uranium dealing - a real "hacking" of the election.
The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.
But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.

CosmicSex said:
You wrong the general public by insisting that we are too dumb to know that the media is biased. There is no leftist agenda as such beyond supporting individuals that align with their viewpoints. This is something all of the media does. Its called having an oponion. But to say that we are helpless. That I buy into Bill ORiley's bigotry simply because he is given a platform, is insane. And you are only half right about the media, they legitimized Trump by refusing to stay on topic and talk about the issues. They have turned the election into a freakshow. They talked about Trump nonstop... but not about his policies. They allowed him to get away with inviting the Russian's into the election. Julian Assange is lying. It is the Russians. Do you really think the CIA would 'kill a staffer' so they could frame Russia? We also know that both the DNC and RNC were hacked. Giving you part of the truth without the whole truth is how people like Julian seek to exert his influence for his own personal reasons. He did it for him. Make no mistake. We are now in that time where we have ignored so much, that Trump is gonna feel like a king. Even if he did cheat, if Russia hacked machines or whatever, it would never matter to some folks and that is scary. By the same tolken I know some are that devoted to Democratic causes. But you are all crazy if you can't tell that something is wrong here. |
I actually gave Americans credit for being smart enough not to believe foreign entities unless they come armed with facts.
They were smart enough to make the right call in the election, so I have a great deal of respect for them and wouldn't accuse them of being dumb. Stop putting words in my mouth.
The CIA have done some completely disgusting things in the past, but no in this case it was probably someone affiliated with the DNC that killed the staffer if he was the source.
Julian Assange has a perfect record on getting his facts right so if anyone's lying about all this, I'd say it's the MSM.
| numberwang said: I wonder how many real journalists are left in this country? Assange is one that comes to mind... https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/793268442329735168?lang=en ![]() ![]() |
Well he's just doing what investigative journalists used to do before they all drank the leftist cool aid.
UnderstatedCornHole said:
I call you out and it turns out you were making things up and what he said was quite different to what you said he said. Who said it required a yes or no answer? What on earth makes you think that!? "I will keep you in suspense", was the answer he gave when pushed to provide an answer on if he will accept the results, his first answer was "I will decide at the time", which is the same thing except in a jokey humanistic way. Every presidential nominee has the right to contest the results of an election if the results appear irregular, Donald Trump was reserving that right. What on earth is wrong with that? Absolutely nothing, you know it, I know it. Everyone knows it. |
Now you're basically saying what's the problem if he didn't give an answer.. see how easy you switch gears to help your own rambling?
Let me hit you with some facts, and then we'll stay on topic. he is the first president nominee to refuse to say he'll accept the results. okay? What does that tell you about what he thinks about democracy? Don't even try to sugar-coat that because you might just eat that up too.
Answer that if you will, but I ain't going to listen to any of your hunches or gut feelings on this anymore, this is getting no where.
