NPD Oct estimates 30% digital. Its still down by a lot cause BO3 also had big digital sales since it was only a year ago .
NPD Oct estimates 30% digital. Its still down by a lot cause BO3 also had big digital sales since it was only a year ago .
Neodegenerate said:
Among the hardcore die-hard video game user base that actually goes on forums I might agree with you. Among the MILLIONS of casual fans who literally only buy their gaming systems for Madden, CoD, and one or two other annual titles? Not a chance. Especially where industry heads talk about an increasing digital rate that was around 20% last year. |
You may have a point, but I won't agree with you because my friends buy digital and like that they can play the same game in different machines and platforms so it's a lot cheaper so it's obvious more and more people are playing digital, so much as 80% or so I am conviced, because of reasons.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
DonFerrari said:
Well it's both. But the point is 80% digital attach ratio. So the drop isn't as severe as we think |
What evidence do you have that 80% of IW sales are digital?
80% digital attach rate for major retail AAA game would be unprecedented... That would be something I think Sony or Activision would say something about if true.
I predict NX launches in 2017 - not 2016
DonFerrari said:
You may have a point, but I won't agree with you because my friends buy digital and like that they can play the same game in different machines and platforms so it's a lot cheaper so it's obvious more and more people are playing digital, so much as 80% or so I am conviced, because of reasons. |
Ok so lets just say that for example, the VGC numbers for CoD are 100% accurate for the Nov 5th week. This means that the game sold, based on your 80%, 6.5million copies in 2 days. You don't think Activision would've said something about that number?
fleischr said:
What evidence do you have that 80% of IW sales are digital? 80% digital attach rate for major retail AAA game would be unprecedented... That would be something I think Sony or Activision would say something about if true. |
Look at Gears of War...
Gears 2 FW was 1.8M
Gears 3 FW was 3M
Gears 4 FW is 600k
The only visible explanation since Gears 4 is a lot better than Gears 2 and 3 is that the game have 80% digital attach ratio. Similar for Halo, that and my friends buying digital is all the evidence I need.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
Neodegenerate said:
Ok so lets just say that for example, the VGC numbers for CoD are 100% accurate for the Nov 5th week. This means that the game sold, based on your 80%, 6.5million copies in 2 days. You don't think Activision would've said something about that number? |
They are humbled for the great sales so they don't want to spoil it.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
DonFerrari said:
They are humbled for the great sales so they don't want to spoil it. |
This and your previous post are remarkably delusional. I can't have this discussion with you.
Edit: Also my math was wrong. The total sales if 80% of all sales were to be digital would be 18.25million. Not 6.5. So yea.
Heh OP seems a little butthurt over a discussion on another thread 😆
edit. There's no need to act like a child over someone else's opinion you know. But for your question, obviously both.
Neodegenerate said:
This and your previous post are remarkably delusional. I can't have this discussion with you. Edit: Also my math was wrong. The total sales if 80% of all sales were to be digital would be 18.25million. Not 6.5. So yea. |
Why not man? Those are all reasonable claims brought on VGC everyday.
KiigelHeart said: Heh OP seems a little butthurt over a discussion on another thread 😆 edit. There's no need to act like a child over someone else's opinion you know. But for your question, obviously both. |
No butthurtness as mine ass is quite big. Just wanted to verify if there were a consensus.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
DonFerrari said:
Why not man? Those are all reasonable claims brought on VGC everyday.
No butthurtness as mine ass is quite big. Just wanted to verify if there were a consensus. |
Claims being made don't make them reasonable. If you honestly believe the game has sold over 18 million copies in 2 days because digital sales are over 80% of the attach, then there is no reason to converse with you about sales because you clearly have no sense of reality.