Ruler said:
These western reviewers gave Overwatch a 10/10, a 4 GB game for 70€ rigged with microtransactions. What is the better product? This or FFXV for 65€, 50+ GB content with much much better graphics imo? Its also the only JRPG that is AAA.
And Gamespot and IGN are counted higher which is unfair, Famitsu wont be allowed to give their score because they are Japanese how is Metacritic really fair? |
I didn't say it was fair, just that your complaint makes 0 sense whatsoever. And if fair averaging is what you want, go to Open Critic. I hope the 1 extra point that gets FFXV makes you feel better. Metacritic isn't perfect, but it's an average and averages are not even that valuable as a metric. It's a hub for finding reviews and a very basic means of getting a feel for the general critical temperature regarding a title.
Ruler said:
Why shouldnt it be 10/10? its the AAA JRPG this gen the only one of its genre. I played the game, the Platinum Demo, Episode Duscae and the Judgement Demo thats more than enough |
Scores don't start at 10 and go down, the game has to justify it's 10. Also, Xenoblade Chronicles X came out like last year, so it's not the only AAA JRPG on the market, though they are few. But scarcity doesn't earn you bonus points.












