Ruler said:
My thread is not about PC vs Console but showcasing what the PS4 Pro offers hardwarewise for the price |
What the Pro offers hardwarewise in that one single game in comparison to an overpriced PC.
If your intention is as innocent as you make it sound, then it's still a very bad comparison that tops it off with a pretty generalizing thread title.
If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.
Ruler said:
no it wont, at 1440p this rig will perform not at PS4 Pro standard, AMD hardware is badly optimized for the majority of PC games |
I'm sorry, what?
Why don't you check this link and check out all the games used to benchmark this card:
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/RX_470_STRIX_OC/21.html
They all perform better than 30FPS at 1440p.
Hell, Fallout 4 hits 57FPS at 1440p on ultra on that card and R6S is over 60.
Please do some research before blatantly lying in these threads.
That's not the first time this week one of your threads is simply a straight lie. No you don't need 1000$ to build a PC that matches Pro at all.
| Azzanation said: 1 game does not factor in much. If a Dev is lazy on the PC side of things than even a WiiU can look better. Its all down to optimization. If the dev wants to utilise the $900 PC hardware to its fullest than this thread wont even exist. |
i can say the same thing about the PS4 Pro there are lazy updates too like Overwatch and great ones like FFXV, Hitman or B1. And those are updates, not games devoloped with PS4 Pro in mind since Day 1 of the devolopement circle
Ruler said:
no you cant |
What do you mean, no I can't?
I already linked a PC build for $479 that outperforms a PS4 Pro and I just stopped playing Overwatch at 4K/60 on my new 1070.
You really love Sony, don't you?
GarlandSteve74 said:
I'm sorry, what? Why don't you check this link and check out all the games used to benchmark this card: https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/RX_470_STRIX_OC/21.html They all perform better than 30FPS at 1440p. Hell, Fallout 4 hits 57FPS at 1440p on ultra on that card and R6S is over 60. Please do some research before blatantly lying in these threads. |
yeah on a $1000 rig for the rest
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/RX_470_STRIX_OC/6.html
The fact that people try to compare the closed architecture of consoles with PC is mindblowing, even with a cheap pc you will have more options and features than a console, and what i don't like is the misinformation of some users, very bad.
GarlandSteve74 said:
What do you mean, no I can't? I already linked a PC build for $479 that outperforms a PS4 Pro and I just stopped playing Overwatch at 4K/60 on my new 1070.
You really love Sony, don't you? |
|
sounds like a $1000 PC to me
Cant imagine anyone thought it would compete with a high end PC, so the pro is a pretty good option for those still on the fence about getting a gaming PC.
i really dont get this mentality why people are getting so aggressive for stating common history, consoles were always sold cheaper for the actual performance they gave. The NES, Genesis, SNES, PS1, Saturn, N64, Dreamcast, PS2, Xbox, Gamecube, Xbox 360 and PS3 were all $1000 PCs/Homecomputers in performance if not more but for a much lower price. The Xbox One and PS4 were the first generation not going along dueto the companies wanting to make profit. The PS4 Pro is going back to that route, its nothing new.
No one back then denied that the PS2 had the same performance of a 1000$ PC why now?
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
