that youtuber's face irritates me.

I can´t, I agree with Dice, I think the medias is biased against Trump, but maybe I am wrong. I just wish they could give the guy a chance. But, I know I better get used to it, it will be 4 years of this. 

I am just happy you guys have a president that will leave Russia alone, if we can postpone WW3 for 4 years consider me a happy camper. 

I will not make Trump threads agains though, this got out of hand way too fast.

If anyone owns a private company or a private club they should be able to do what they want with it and not be infringed by the government as long as it stays in their group. South park had a perfect episode where the boy scouts kicked the former scout leader out because he was gay. Eventually the liberal media got upset and try to force the boy scouts to accept the former scout leader. The gay scout leader deny going back as the leader because he didn't want to force the boy scouts to change their beliefs. Because it is their belief and they have the right to run their private organization as they want. As long as your rules stays within your private organization I don't care what they do pretty much. I hate the westboro church with a passion, but they can practice their hate speech all they want.

Of course not. He just wants to fulfil his huge ego.

"They won't even let us be assholes!  THEY'RE the intolerant ones!"

These guys represent Left Wing views about as much as Westboro Baptist Church represents Christianity and Right Wing views. And they should be treated with the same level of disdain from both sides of the political spectrum.

Please just remember always that you can agree with people on some things but not others.  OK, so the media is biased against Trump, does that mean that in this specific case they are saying he's a monster?  Does media bias automatically mean Dice is fair on all his videos?  This guy is not your best friend that will be offended if you disagree with him and then you'll be lonely.  He's just a guy with strong opinions, some of which you agree with. 

And like the guy in my sig said, "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts."

We should decapitate the cunt for that.

You have to think about what matters. Nowadays you can get 250.000$ for a single speech in the next avenue, all president are very wealthy, giving 400.000$ is an archaism. And nowaday accepting a salary and giving it to charity is just creating more debt.

It's not the story of the year, but invoquing the Constitution and founding fathers for such a thing is what undermine the meaning of it. The point of any Constitution is to give fundamental principles the laws will be based on, it's not about making a silly point for a short term political agenda. If Trump really breaks the constitution at some point on something meaningful (could happen, right ?) then what, an article again about the Constitution ?

In the next avenue yes, but you're not going to be able to earn that money while you're actually president.  If your argument is that the 400,000 dollars is insignificant to the candidate, then it's even more insignificant in terms of the national debt.

It's not undermining the meaning of it, this is the exact purpose of that part of the constitution. I don't think this is really a big deal, but the response, an article, is perfectly proportional to the action.  If he breaks it in a more  meaningful way, then congress should begin proceedings for impeachment.