I will never trust nvidia after the ps3 desaster
REQUIESCAT IN PACE
I Hate REMASTERS
I Hate PLAYSTATION PLUS
I will never trust nvidia after the ps3 desaster
REQUIESCAT IN PACE
I Hate REMASTERS
I Hate PLAYSTATION PLUS


| thismeintiel said: Personally, I wouldn't expect anything over 1/2 the power of the XBO, nor many AAA ports to the system, for that matter. Well, unless this thing pulls a Wii, but I highly doubt that. |
As you imply, AAA ports are completely dependent on install base. If the Switch sells 50MM units, you can rest assured that many of the big games will be there.
thismeintiel said:
Comparing the PS4 trailer and the Switch trailer is completely apple and oranges. The Switch was revealed in a single trailer. There was no 2 hour conference revealing the system, which was streamed by multiple sources. You wanted to find out the first real info on the Switch, firsthand, you had to watch that trailer. Sony had a conference explaining basically everything about the system, including specs, and then released a trailer. It's amazing the PS4 trailer got so many views considering. We'll just have to wait and see how well Nintendo is at converting those views into sales, like Sony was able to do. @ OP Man, Nvidia wants back into the console biz bad. Which is weird considering they were bashing it for the past few years. Also, sounds to me that they are prioritizing mobility and energy efficiency (this one always seems like a big thing for Nintendo) over power, which makes sense being a tablet with controls. Personally, I wouldn't expect anything over 1/2 the power of the XBO, nor many AAA ports to the system, for that matter. Well, unless this thing pulls a Wii, but I highly doubt that. |
Hence why the Switch will not turn out another Wii U. Theres already a difference from how little we know about it.
Pocky Lover Boy!

thismeintiel said:
Comparing the PS4 trailer and the Switch trailer is completely apple and oranges. The Switch was revealed in a single trailer. There was no 2 hour conference revealing the system, which was streamed by multiple sources. You wanted to find out the first real info on the Switch, firsthand, you had to watch that trailer. Sony had a conference explaining basically everything about the system, including specs, and then released a trailer. It's amazing the PS4 trailer got so many views considering. We'll just have to wait and see how well Nintendo is at converting those views into sales, like Sony was able to do. @ OP Man, Nvidia wants back into the console biz bad. Which is weird considering they were bashing it for the past few years. Also, sounds to me that they are prioritizing mobility and energy efficiency (this one always seems like a big thing for Nintendo) over power, which makes sense being a tablet with controls. Personally, I wouldn't expect anything over 1/2 the power of the XBO, nor many AAA ports to the system, for that matter. Well, unless this thing pulls a Wii, but I highly doubt that. |
It's because their forray into gaming devices has more or less failed with the Shield. At minimum, it didn't have the impact they had projected or at least hoped for.
vivster said:
You do know that "android based" and "being android" are different things? Android is much like Linux very customizable while still using the same kernel. It would actually be very wise for Nintendo to go that route with Tegra, which is already a proven entity for that OS. It would basically open up a big pool of already proven Android games to come to the system. That would give the Switch more leverage when it comes to convincing mobile users to get a Switch. Piracy and quality control are not Android problems but Google problems. If you look closer then Android as a platform is as legitimate as any other gaming platform and does not lag behind in quantity or quality of games. For example it's the platform with the most DQ games ever. |
Of course. It's the ability for every vendor to create their own version of Android that has resulted in the market fragmentation that makes iOS produce twice as much revenue on half as many downloads.
While I don't know whether Nintendo would want to use Android any more than you do, the only reason would be as a shortcut.
You're probably thinking compatibility: the Android powered Switch would be able to play all the existing Android games/apps or something to that effect, but I'm thinking Nintendo wants to stamp its brand firmly on the Switch and the perception that it was powered by another flavor of Android, even if it was Nintendo's flavor wouldn't exactly help the product distinguish itself, and that would include having it run all the same Android apps that run on all the existing Android devices.
But, as I said, I don't know. Only Nintendo's engineers and presumably any 3rd party software developers know.
Even CNET reported:
Great question. Nintendo typically rolls its own operating systems, and it probably will again, since purpose-built software is often more reliable and efficient. Or, it could be Android under the hood -- maybe a very, very lean, modified build of Android like the one Amazon uses on its tablets.
I don't really get how the Switch is groundbreaking and innovative... It's not like it's the Wii U. It's just a hybrid console. The Switch still is a cool idea, but it's not ground-breaking, haha. It's not going to bring major changes to games.



![]()
Dance my pretties!
The Official Art Thread - The Official Manga Thread - The Official Starbound Thread
Going by his comment on PS4 and X1 being commodities on their SoC I suspect they aren't charging cheap for the chip, so doesn't get hopes high that it will be very powerfull, small, low energy and very cheap.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
Lol. That sentense is such a great start for a joke...
"Hell, it was so groundbreaking that we defeated Godzilla by throwing it at its feets and opening a giant, black hole. Never saw a Japanese lizard that big being flushed down a hole the size of Tokyo."
"The first time we booted it, we went back in time so be could undo the Virtual boy. What boy thing? What were we talking about again...?"
"When booted it runs so smoothly, we used it butter up, stuff it in a Tesla and joyride on the moon. With the Switch you can run those craters at full speed, i tell you!"
"When you plug the Switch in, it drains all power from a radius of 50 miles. It's great for blackout friday and snuggling in the dark. The Japanese ministry of health recommends it for childless couples on a weekly basis."
In the wilderness we go alone with our new knowledge and strength.
greenmedic88 said:
Of course. It's the ability for every vendor to create their own version of Android that has resulted in the market fragmentation that makes iOS produce twice as much revenue on half as many downloads. While I don't know whether Nintendo would want to use Android any more than you do, the only reason would be as a shortcut. You're probably thinking compatibility: the Android powered Switch would be able to play all the existing Android games/apps or something to that effect, but I'm thinking Nintendo wants to stamp its brand firmly on the Switch and the perception that it was powered by another flavor of Android, even if it was Nintendo's flavor wouldn't exactly help the product distinguish itself, and that would include having it run all the same Android apps that run on all the existing Android devices. But, as I said, I don't know. Only Nintendo's engineers and presumably any 3rd party software developers know. Even CNET reported: What operating system is it running?Great question. Nintendo typically rolls its own operating systems, and it probably will again, since purpose-built software is often more reliable and efficient. Or, it could be Android under the hood -- maybe a very, very lean, modified build of Android like the one Amazon uses on its tablets. |
And how is it good to differentiate yourself by being worse? Or is WiiU OS or even Wii top of class OSs to make it a good diferentiation?

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
I'll have to just wait and see how the Switch is for myself.