Soundwave said:
RolStoppable said:
That sounds like an incredibly stupid partnership. Nintendo gets to distribute the toxic Xbox brand in Europe and Japan/Asia while Microsoft gets Nintendo games on their platform. You need to go back to the drawing board.
|
I would say a equitable or favorable deal (for Nintendo) would be
Microsoft Gets:
- Certain Nintendo games and VC games on XBox and Windows PC platform. Nintendo chooses which ones (minimum of 3-4 console titles per year).
- Nintendo design input/support into hardware/controller design.
- Shared profits in Minecraft x Nintendo collaborations and Minecraft Amiibo toys.
- Can publish on Switch with no licensing fees.
- No Nintendo games on Playstation formats; obviously this would generally make the XBox brand far more competetive worldwide.
- Potential of maybe Windows mobile OS used in future Switch iterations.
- Agreement by Nintendo for the length of said contract that they will not make a dedicated home console to compete against XBox directly. Switch and other portable centric platforms are allowed and fully supported by MS.
Nintendo Gets:
- Co-branding of XBox worldwide (meaning Nintendo logo is on the hardware alongside MS logo).
- Distribution of XBox hardware in Asia/Japan and possibly EU markets (Germany, France, Italy, etc.).
- Input into hardware designs.
- A 20-40% cut of XBox third party royalty fees and no royalty fees charged on their own XBox console software (100% take home profit)
- Microsoft Software support for Switch (Halo Switch, Banjo-Kazooie Switch, etc. etc.)
- MS covers marketing costs for Nintendo's XBox titles.
- Perhaps on top of that just regular ol' money bags too.
|