By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - PS4 Pro: Ultimate Facts

weaveworld said:

First of all many thanks for linking but all that stuff i have read on plenty of different sites already and thats why i came to ask here. It might be my lack of comprehensive skills but i am still confused. Or maybe more annoyed by the way sites are describing this issue.

I have 4 cables and they all say 'high speed' but not one has it mentioned wether they run at 18Gbps or less. Nor any mention of 1.4 or 2.0. These are all cables bought in the past 2 years from different retailers and different quality varying in prize from 4 euro's to 20 euro's. Now retailers do advertise with 2.0 cables which seems to be bullshit because it isn't a change in cable or connector from what all these informed sites tell you but in the same sentence they mention the 'new' standard for running 4k at 60hz... For which you would need 2.0 cables???

Am I this stupid I ask of you...

let me try and help you out. 

 

  • HDMI 1.3 (aka high speed) 2006
    2560 x 1600p @60fps max 10Gbs

  • HDMI 1.4 2009
    4096 x 2160 @30fps max 10Gbs

  • HDMI 2.0 2013
    4096 x 2160 @60fps max 18Gbs
thats basically it. First two are both 10gbs cables just that one can support that bandwidth over longer distances and has a number of other features built in. 
So your high speed cables? Are actually HDMI 1.3 and will also support 4k but don't expect everything to work smoothly. May not support deep color, may not handshake properly over certain distances...etc. 

 



Around the Network

Games that dip below 30fps on the PS4, would they run more stably on the Pro and will load times be faster?

I imagine Pro patches for games are just to add new pro modes, such as improved graphical fidelity or 4k checkerboard, which differs from what I am asking above.



There are no HDMI 2.0 and HDMI 1.4 cables. There are only Standard HDMI and High Speed HDMI cables. If your cable is a HS HDMI and adheres to the specs it's going to support HDMI 2.0a speeds, i.e. 4K 60Hz HDR.

If you bought the super cheapest cable and it's a bit longer you might run into issues. But for as long as you have a decent HS HDMI cable you DO NOT need a new cable.

If it works, it works. If it doesn't buy a cable with that Premium High Speed HDMI cable. It's even in the wording from HDMI.org:

"...special certification designations for High Speed HDMI Cables that have been designed and certified for ULTRA-RELIABLE performance for 4K and advanced features..."



weaveworld said:
SvennoJ said:


Will I need to buy new HDMI 2.0 cables?

That depends. You can use your existing HDMI cables with new HDMI 2.0 connections as the connectors themselves haven't changed. While there's no such thing as an HDMI 2.0 cable per se, displaying 4K at 50/60Hz will require a High Speed/Category 2 HDMI cable. You can pick one up for a few pounds/dollars online. Don't spend any more.

First of all many thanks for linking but all that stuff i have read on plenty of different sites already and thats why i came to ask here. It might be my lack of comprehensive skills but i am still confused. Or maybe more annoyed by the way sites are describing this issue.

I have 4 cables and they all say 'high speed' but not one has it mentioned wether they run at 18Gbps or less. Nor any mention of 1.4 or 2.0. These are all cables bought in the past 2 years from different retailers and different quality varying in prize from 4 euro's to 20 euro's. Now retailers do advertise with 2.0 cables which seems to be bullshit because it isn't a change in cable or connector from what all these informed sites tell you but in the same sentence they mention the 'new' standard for running 4k at 60hz... For which you would need 2.0 cables???

Am I this stupid I ask of you...

To get technical it all depends on signal to noise ratio of the physical wires inside the cable. It's not so simple as 1's and 0's flying through the cable. Quality of materials and shielding effects the signal and due to interference the signal arrives more like 0.7 - 0.3 ish at the other end (over simplification) The higher the speed you try to push signals through the cable, the shorter the pulses, the bigger the effect of interference and signal degradation.

This is what the signal looks like travelling through your cable

1080i left, 1080p right. The longer the cable, the higher the speed, and depending on materials, the 'eye' in the middle separating the signals will get smaller and smaller until the signal corrupts. http://www.hdmi.org/installers/eyediagram.aspx
Very detailed explanation: http://www.onsemi.com/pub_link/Collateral/AND9075-D.PDF (Uderstanding data eye diagrams)

So yes, all the cables have the same capabilities. The speed rating guarantees that the cable has been tested to be able to run at that speed with sufficient signal to noise ratio that it should never drop any bits. That doesn't mean that a cable tested for slower speeds isn't physically good enough to run at a higher speed.

If the signal to noise ratio isn't good enough, the receiving end will start interpreting the 1's and 0's wrong, which is immediately visible as no signal at all or image corruption. It's not like analog where you get a slightly worse looking picture, it's either pristine or full of corrupted lines. So it's not complete bullshit, the 2.0 speed rating simply means the cable has been tested to run at 18 Gbps.

Hdmi 2.0 ports have some tricks up its sleeve to improve the signal quality as well, so it's not as easy to say that an older cable won't be good enough.
https://www.synopsys.com/Company/Publications/SynopsysInsight/Pages/Art3-hdmi-2.0-IssQ3-13.aspx?cmp=Insight-I3-2013-Art3

The only way to know for sure it to simply test the cable.



Ka-pi96 said:
Zkuq said:

There should maybe be a rule to prevent paid updates for PS4 Pro features. It's not likely that anyone is going to do it, but just in case.

I dunno, I think it`s fair to allow devs to charge for the updated features (on already released games only of course). They have to go back and spend time/money on doing that update so what`s the incentive for them to want to do that unless they have the option of actually charging for it?

They shouldn't have external incentives like that, I think. I think it's somewhat comparable to the trophy thing we had on PS3. The first games didn't have trophies, yet some of them got trophy support patched in. I don't think anyone charger for it, and I don't think anyone was allowed to either. I think this feels kind of similar. You have a point though, I just personally think it feels wrong. I hate it how absolutely every single thing in gaming seems to revolve around money these days.



Around the Network
Zkuq said:
Ka-pi96 said:

I dunno, I think it`s fair to allow devs to charge for the updated features (on already released games only of course). They have to go back and spend time/money on doing that update so what`s the incentive for them to want to do that unless they have the option of actually charging for it?

They shouldn't have external incentives like that, I think. I think it's somewhat comparable to the trophy thing we had on PS3. The first games didn't have trophies, yet some of them got trophy support patched in. I don't think anyone charger for it, and I don't think anyone was allowed to either. I think this feels kind of similar. You have a point though, I just personally think it feels wrong. I hate it how absolutely every single thing in gaming seems to revolve around money these days.

Life revolves around money.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

I was in a hurry yesterday, and didn't get a chance to say thanks, so thank you. Nice post.



- "If you have the heart of a true winner, you can always get more pissed off than some other asshole."

"Q: Can I use my PS4 Pro as a “second” primary account?
No, you can only choose one PS4 device to be your primary account."

This is horseshit. I have 3 ( 2 active ) Vitas and 3 ( 2 active ) PS3s. It's all very lovely, and I'm totally on the up and up. I don't pirate anything. I'm a loyal, fanatical customer. And now I want 2 PS4's active, and I can't? I don't even know what the restrictions are. Was gonna read about it a few nights ago, but was too tired.



- "If you have the heart of a true winner, you can always get more pissed off than some other asshole."

So glad about the SATA-III support. Now I can just buy a 4 TB Samsung harddrive off Amazon for $140. Never have to worry about space again.



0331 Happiness is a belt-fed weapon

DialgaMarine said:
So glad about the SATA-III support. Now I can just buy a 4 TB Samsung harddrive off Amazon for $140. Never have to worry about space again.

So which 4TB-HDD are you trying to fit in the HDD cage?