By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Hillary Clinton won. How much time till Nuclear War?

Tagged games:

 

Hillary Clinton won. How much time till Nuclear War?

There will be no nuclear ... 168 47.19%
 
Nuclear World war in 2017... 64 17.98%
 
Nuclear Armaggedom in 2018. 15 4.21%
 
We will be living like Fallout 4 in 2019. 55 15.45%
 
Nuclear war before her term ends. 54 15.17%
 
Total:356
StarOcean said:
WagnerPaiva said:

You want CNN, MSNBC, ABC News, Whashington Post, New Yourk Times? How can I give you this? These people are sold to the Clintons and to George Soros and the Silicon Valley billionaires, they are globalist propaganda. All I can give is RT videos, alternative media reports and Putin himself saying he will protect Bashar.

That you will not accept.

In other words, you have absolutely no credibility whatsoever and are just making up things as you go along. You have no sources because they never said it

Star Ocean, my friend, the thing is that my sources are not trustyworth to you, you do not like RT, you of course won´t read the reports from alternative media.

If I send you youtube links from Putin saying he will protect Bashar, you won´t watch. If I send you Chris Gree reports about this you will say AMTV is fear-porn.

What can I say? the MSMedia will not report on this because that would harm Hillary and Obama. What can I do?

It is unfair, cause I also do not trust the sources you hold dear. What is the diference? If you want Youtube videos and alt media reports, I have them.

This is like when you guys closed the thread that man did with the video footage of democratics planing hoax riots on Trump rallies. You guys said "it is edited and not from a mainstream source" but the footage was beyond any shadow of doubt REAL and very incriminating to Clinton.

It is freaking unfair and you guys should be ashamed of yourselves. I have links, sources, you do not want cause they are not mainstream, how is that fair?



My grammar errors are justified by the fact that I am a brazilian living in Brazil. I am also very stupid.

Around the Network
Goatseye said:
LadyJasmine said:

 

If she is running at 4-6 point Margin against a Trump imagine how she would fare against a Half Decent Candidate...

Hillary is deeply unpopular with Males than she is popular with females...

 

Remember that... 

Gender shouldn't even be brought up when someone is running for office of any kind. It is a petty issue.

This election has reached the "Idiocracy" level thanks to Elizondo Trump. 

its a petty issue but its an issue.

 

Hillary Clinton is deeply unpopular with male voters and even those who support her are quite blah about it. 



WagnerPaiva said:
StarOcean said:

In other words, you have absolutely no credibility whatsoever and are just making up things as you go along. You have no sources because they never said it

Star Ocean, my friend, the thing is that my sources are not trustyworth to you, you do not like RT, you of course won´t read the reports from alternative media.

If I send you youtube links from Putin saying he will protect Bashar, you won´t watch. If I send you Chris Gree reports about this you will say AMTV is fear-porn.

What can I say? the MSMedia will not report on this because that would harm Hillary and Obama. What can I do?

It is unfair, cause I also do not trust the sources you hold dear. What is the diference? If you want Youtube videos and alt media reports, I have them.

Give me 3 creditable sources from Russian media and Chinese media. They have to be from official Russian and Chinese sources. 



To be fair Hillary has been proven to be extremely warlike and Hawkish compared to Obama in Syria

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/06/hillary-clinton-arming-syrian-rebels-memoir



This is a complete cavalcade of nonsense.



Around the Network
StarOcean said:
WagnerPaiva said:

Star Ocean, my friend, the thing is that my sources are not trustyworth to you, you do not like RT, you of course won´t read the reports from alternative media.

If I send you youtube links from Putin saying he will protect Bashar, you won´t watch. If I send you Chris Gree reports about this you will say AMTV is fear-porn.

What can I say? the MSMedia will not report on this because that would harm Hillary and Obama. What can I do?

It is unfair, cause I also do not trust the sources you hold dear. What is the diference? If you want Youtube videos and alt media reports, I have them.

Give me 3 creditable sources from Russian media and Chinese media. They have to be from official Russian and Chinese sources. 

Some of these are really straigh foward, in some you got to read between the lines. There are youtube videos of Putin saying Bashar will not go down in his watch, but they are from AMTV and Infowars, so I will not list them. You can google them yourself.

Here are some links from non-alternative sources. If you allowed me to cite alt-media, I could give you hundreds.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3235708/Putin-vows-continue-providing-Assad-military-aid-Russian-president-says-impossible-defeat-ISIS-without-supporting-Syrian-regime.html

http://www.russia-direct.org/opinion/why-does-russia-continue-protect-assad-syria

http://yournewswire.com/putin-vows-to-protect-assad-from-us-dirty-tricks/

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/11/putin-immediately-destroy-target-threatening-russia-syria

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/26/russia-suport-assad_n_6226464.html

http://www.chinapost.com.tw/international/middle-east/2012/01/11/328688/Syrias-Bashar.htm

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/world-war-three-extremely-lethal-8987162

http://www.ibtimes.com/war-games-russia-china-join-forces-against-global-us-missile-shield-2430751



My grammar errors are justified by the fact that I am a brazilian living in Brazil. I am also very stupid.

WagnerPaiva said:
StarOcean said:

Give me 3 creditable sources from Russian media and Chinese media. They have to be from official Russian and Chinese sources. 

Some of these are really straigh foward, in some you got to read between the lines. There are youtube videos of Putin saying Bashar will not go down in his watch, but they are from AMTV and Infowars, so I will not list them. You can google them yourself.

Here are some links from non-alternative sources. If you allowed me to cite alt-media, I could give you hundreds.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3235708/Putin-vows-continue-providing-Assad-military-aid-Russian-president-says-impossible-defeat-ISIS-without-supporting-Syrian-regime.html

http://www.russia-direct.org/opinion/why-does-russia-continue-protect-assad-syria

http://yournewswire.com/putin-vows-to-protect-assad-from-us-dirty-tricks/

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/11/putin-immediately-destroy-target-threatening-russia-syria

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/26/russia-suport-assad_n_6226464.html

http://www.chinapost.com.tw/international/middle-east/2012/01/11/328688/Syrias-Bashar.htm

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/world-war-three-extremely-lethal-8987162

http://www.ibtimes.com/war-games-russia-china-join-forces-against-global-us-missile-shield-2430751

None of those are Russian or Chinese news sources



StarOcean said:

None of those are Russian or Chinese news sources

These are RUPTLY, RT reports on USA taunts, Syria and nuclear war threats. RT says what the russian government and people thinks.

It is, of course, not what you wanted in full. How could I give you that? But it is a very interesting way to view the Clinton nuclear threat. One that, I assure you, you will never see in the Washington Post.

https://www.rt.com/news/363960-russia-us-asymmetric-sanctions/

https://www.rt.com/shows/sophieco/364783-china-sea-territorial-disputes/

https://www.rt.com/op-edge/364677-clinton-emails-investigation-fbi/

https://www.rt.com/op-edge/364731-clinton-elections-rig-fbi-palestine/

https://www.rt.com/news/364349-putin-valdai-us-election/

https://www.rt.com/op-edge/364567-terrorism-west-russia-wars-propaganda/

https://www.rt.com/op-edge/364456-clinton-war-russia-trump/

https://www.rt.com/politics/364829-half-of-russians-fear-syrian/

https://www.rt.com/news/364563-robots-nuclear-strike-rogozin/

https://www.rt.com/news/364148-russia-tests-hypersonic-glider/

https://www.rt.com/news/364520-us-china-thaad-sanctions/



My grammar errors are justified by the fact that I am a brazilian living in Brazil. I am also very stupid.

the-pi-guy said:

I'm still waiting for the last few apocalypses to happen.  

I lived through 

-8 years of Obama

-December 21, 2012

-2016 election.  

 

I'm ready for whatever is next.  

Nuclear war has nothing to do with the biblical apocalypse. It is just something we must avoid at all costs cause it would kill most of mankind and let the survivors damned to live in a Fallout like world for at least 50 years.

Not in any line I said this is biblical or prophecy, not once. 



My grammar errors are justified by the fact that I am a brazilian living in Brazil. I am also very stupid.

WagnerPaiva said:
StarOcean said:

None of those are Russian or Chinese news sources

These are RUPTLY, RT reports on USA taunts, Syria and nuclear war threats. RT says what the russian government and people thinks.

It is, of course, not what you wanted in full. How could I give you that? But it is a very interesting way to view the Clinton nuclear threat. One that, I assure you, you will never see in the Washington Post.

https://www.rt.com/news/363960-russia-us-asymmetric-sanctions/

https://www.rt.com/shows/sophieco/364783-china-sea-territorial-disputes/

https://www.rt.com/op-edge/364677-clinton-emails-investigation-fbi/

https://www.rt.com/op-edge/364731-clinton-elections-rig-fbi-palestine/

https://www.rt.com/news/364349-putin-valdai-us-election/

https://www.rt.com/op-edge/364567-terrorism-west-russia-wars-propaganda/

https://www.rt.com/op-edge/364456-clinton-war-russia-trump/

https://www.rt.com/politics/364829-half-of-russians-fear-syrian/

https://www.rt.com/news/364563-robots-nuclear-strike-rogozin/

https://www.rt.com/news/364148-russia-tests-hypersonic-glider/

https://www.rt.com/news/364520-us-china-thaad-sanctions/

and none of those shows any such quote of clinton promising to kill Assad or Russia promising nuclear war. Neither the US nor Russia is dumb enough to commit suicide by going to war.