By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Bethesda: Skyrim is not confirmed for Switch

Darwinianevolution on 21 October 2016
KLXVER said:
Darwinianevolution said:

That is not the point of the matter. Whether the footage was real or not I don't know because I'm not an expert. The problem is the fact that Nintendo used Skyrim footage. If the game was not confirmed, Nintendo would have probably chosen another game, not just used Skyrim and risk themselves to be busted moments after the trailer. Too much risk for a game that old. My theory is that Bethesda here has a problem. They will release Skyrim HD for the PS4/XBOne way before this version comes, and they have also to follow Nintendo's instructions of not revealing something before date. And they can't say the game is unconfirmed, because we just saw it on the trailer. So they have to be purposely vague about it, even if it's obvious what is happening.

That sounds like Nintendo is the problem then.

True. Bethesda has a problem Nintendo caused. Kinda dumb to not let the 3rd parties announce their games before release, that would put the console's name on the minds of the people following said games.



You know it deserves the GOTY.

Come join The 2018 Obscure Game Monthly Review Thread.

Around the Network
DonFerrari on 21 October 2016

Now, maybe the game wasn't even running on it but just a .avi of it being displayed?

So the supposition that the handheld is stronger than X1 because it could run Skrym Remastered have gone down?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

DonFerrari on 21 October 2016

Well... Nintendo made that Zelda technical show on Wii and it never came to light, so Bethesda uses the same card.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

KLXVER on 21 October 2016
DonFerrari said:
Well... Nintendo made that Zelda technical show on Wii and it never came to light, so Bethesda uses the same card.

So Bethesda made an entire new technical showcase for the Switch? Well thats dedication at least.



Louie on 21 October 2016

Nintendo doesn't want developers to talk about their games yet. It's as simple as that. Hell, Nintendo doesn't want to talk about their *own* games right now: we have seen a glimpse of a 3D Mario game and what could've been ports of Wii U games - as if Nintendo wouldn't have enough games ready for their one and only hardware system when they usually release more than 20 games per year across platforms.



Around the Network
DonFerrari on 21 October 2016
KLXVER said:
DonFerrari said:
Well... Nintendo made that Zelda technical show on Wii and it never came to light, so Bethesda uses the same card.

So Bethesda made an entire new technical showcase for the Switch? Well thats dedication at least.

They seem to have only captured scenes of any other version and put on the showcase, who knows?

 

Best yet is people that think Skyrim version of Switch will be superior to Pro or Scorpio... really?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

KLXVER on 21 October 2016
Louie said:
Nintendo doesn't want developers to talk about their games yet. It's as simple as that. Hell, Nintendo doesn't want to talk about their *own* games right now: we have seen a glimpse of a 3D Mario game and what could've been ports of Wii U games - as if Nintendo wouldn't have enough games ready for their one and only hardware system when they usually release more than 20 games per year across platforms.

Why wouldnt Nintendo want Bethesda to talk about how they are bringing one of their biggest games to the Switch? Makes no sense...



KLXVER on 21 October 2016
DonFerrari said:
KLXVER said:

So Bethesda made an entire new technical showcase for the Switch? Well thats dedication at least.

They seem to have only captured scenes of any other version and put on the showcase, who knows?

 

Best yet is people that think Skyrim version of Switch will be superior to Pro or Scorpio... really?

Well I havent heard anyone say that. The selling point seem to be Skyrim on the go.



DonFerrari on 21 October 2016
KLXVER said:
DonFerrari said:

They seem to have only captured scenes of any other version and put on the showcase, who knows?

 

Best yet is people that think Skyrim version of Switch will be superior to Pro or Scorpio... really?

Well I havent heard anyone say that. The selling point seem to be Skyrim on the go.

There were two or three people in this very thread... believe it or not



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Louie on 21 October 2016
KLXVER said:
Louie said:
Nintendo doesn't want developers to talk about their games yet. It's as simple as that. Hell, Nintendo doesn't want to talk about their *own* games right now: we have seen a glimpse of a 3D Mario game and what could've been ports of Wii U games - as if Nintendo wouldn't have enough games ready for their one and only hardware system when they usually release more than 20 games per year across platforms.

Why wouldnt Nintendo want Bethesda to talk about how they are bringing one of their biggest games to the Switch? Makes no sense...

Yet. Why would Nintendo not talk about their own big games right now? Doesn't make sense either, right? But they don't. They want all games to be revealed at once I guess.