Captain_Yuri said:
Xen said:
That is...bad. Real bad. And a real missed opportunity, at that. Nvidia itself makes GPU's that sip power while being quite powerful - at the time of finalizing specs, they could already have access to something quite nice such as a GTX 960m.
It's not gonna get even the XBO if they value battery life at all - there is simply no mobile SOC for that.
|
I think its best to really think of it as a handheld that connects to a TV rather than it being a hybrid or a console that turns into a handheld. Because if we think about it from a handheld prespective, this is the most powerful handheld with one of the biggest leaps we have seen in terms of performance. But if we think of it has a console, performance wise, its not going to be very impressive. At the end of the day, I think the devs that were making games for both the Vita and 3ds will come to this one and that is whats really important. But don't think that it will all of a sudden have all the western third parties on board.
|
Nintendo itself says it's a home console first (even if they presented it as a mobile :D ).
It's a pity and a missed opportunity. The dedicated handheld market, even if Nintendo's strength, has shrunk, and is shrinking, anywhere but in Japan. Home consoles however, are quite healthy. The only advantage this approach has is less droughts in games - which, thanks to more ample power were never a problem for consoles such as XBO/PS4 - in fact, consistently, you gotta pick your games so you have time for them. Power parity with them would bring at least SOME games to the plate.
How many people are gonna lug around this big and fragile thing with them? I will venture a guess: not many. This works much better for the home, and it misses serving that market by having hardware that will be anemic, even when compared to XBO/PS4.
It's sad, but it's exactly what I expected from Nintendo: their own niche thing.