Nintendo had to sacrifice power to keep the cost down. it looks like an expensive device.

Are you drunk by any chance?

would be commercial suicide, although I think it will be weaker than X1 which is diappointing

The home docking mode seems to give it a boost, whereas the mobile part has a drop

Zelda looked jaggy and laggy my friends. Nintendo done goofed. I will wait until we see full screen videogame trailers but all signs point to failure. 90% of people want power and things that look good. It's really not rocket science. Who is in charge of that company?

Not even the most cynical PC overlord would claim to see anything worth of a comparison in that footage.

Why would it be weaker than the WiiU just because it is a kinda-sorta handheld? And do you think Bethesda would have even bothered if they had to work with something EVEN WEAKER than the U?

supposedly these are the specs. Take it with a grain of salt.

CPU:
Four ARM Cortex-A57 cores, maximum 2 GHz
L2 cache, 2 MB
64-bit ARMv8
Crypto extension enabled

GPU:
NVIDIA second-generation Maxwell architecture
256 CUDA cores, maximum 1 GHz
1024 FLOPS/cycle
Texture: 16 pixels/cycle
Fill: 14.4 pixels/cycle

Main memory:
Capacity of 4 GB
Bandwidth: 25.6 GB/s
VRAM: shared

System Memory:
Capacity: 32 GB, Maximum transfer rate: 400 MB/s
USB
USB 2.0 and 3.0
Video Output
60 fps, at a maximum of 1920×1080 pixels
Or 30 fps at 3840×2160 pixels
The screen:
6.2" IPS LCD, 1280×720 pixels
Capacitance method, 10-point multi-touch

What's with all these troll threads.

You don't seem to know how easy it is for a mobile SoC to top the power of the Wii U.