I don't see anything negative in MS' statement.
Literally the design goal of Scorpio is to be the most powerful console.
Not just hoping it will end up that way, but using significantly higher budget to ensure that.
Because when you throw an extra $100+ of performance hardware around, you get higher performance.
Their memory model is moved to that of PS4, just with better clock/core#/architecture.
Clearly Sony's strategy post-Scorpio will not be to literally contest that category,
but say "OK, ours is $100 cheaper (or whatever), and still looks/plays great, with many games."
So according to House, MS should say "OK ours costs $100+ more, but we can't tell you what we do with that."?
Xbone was the weaker of the two consoles. MS is designing Scorpio to be the strongest, by far.
Is Sony complaining that MS doesn't stand still? Laughable.
I mean, I don't really see MS changing sales landscape alot with Scorpio, but the defensiveness in Sony's reaction is absurd.
(at most I expect Scorpio+Xbone to achieve 1:2 sales vs. PS4og/s/pro, up from current ~1:3, obviously intro is higher than avg)