Goodnightmoon said:
Acevil said:
Lets not turn this into who is better contest. I will defend Nintendo on their ability to protect trademark, and I will defend sony on the fact they have right to do this, namely since a lot of their studios have not delievered in a manner they most likely wanted.
|
I just remebered they talked about this issue, if the statement was made by other company then I would be talking about it instead of Nintendo but is not the case. I'm not really judging Sony here either, they do have the rights and what they have done is far from the worst business practices in the industry like EA, but it is an issue worth talking about I believe.
|
Well, it is not like Sony is actually taking talented parts of their first party stripping them of everything that makes them strong, getting the game out, than releasing them. These studios so far, have not been producing calibur of content and sales that you would not get from better third party publisher.
Ka-pi96 said:
Well you could argue that giving someone a job (even if only temporary) is better than never giving them a job...
|
Actually it could be argued having high turnover is bad, because the process involved in creating or buying something than to disolve it might seem as a wasted resources. (This is not related to sony, but more that statement you made).