iclim4 said: FishyJoe said: The irony is that in other blu-ray threads, you have people saying internet speed is too slow for video. Now that it's a feature for home, all the sudden internet speeds are fine for video. LMAO at the hypocrisy. Minutes after twesterm got me to thinking that I might have misjudged you, you're at it again. I applaud at your consistency and perseverance Fishy. But, I digress. I'll just leave this thread. Carry on FishyJoe.

 I don't see how that is trolling.We are all responding to Leo-js statement that you could watch blu-ray movies while somebody else is watching them 200miles away on the same connection. That is in no way trolling. 

sc94597 said: iclim4 said: FishyJoe said: The irony is that in other blu-ray threads, you have people saying internet speed is too slow for video. Now that it's a feature for home, all the sudden internet speeds are fine for video. LMAO at the hypocrisy. Minutes after twesterm got me to thinking that I might have misjudged you, you're at it again. I applaud at your consistency and perseverance Fishy. But, I digress. I'll just leave this thread. Carry on FishyJoe.  I don't see how that is trolling.We are all responding to Leo-js statement that you could watch blu-ray movies while somebody else is watching them 200miles away on the same connection. That is in no way trolling.

Obviously the video in home isn't as big as Blu-ray.
And when did Leo-j become a plural representation of a stereotype?

Edit:And wasn't it you who stated that FIOS, arguably one the biggest factors, costs $200.
Would you consider that a mass market product for internet connection?
Edit2: Also, I didn't say he was trolling.

iclim4 said: sc94597 said: iclim4 said: Minutes after twesterm got me to thinking that I might have misjudged you, you're at it again. I applaud at your consistency and perseverance Fishy. But, I digress. I'll just leave this thread. Carry on FishyJoe. I don't see how that is trolling.We are all responding to Leo-js statement that you could watch blu-ray movies while somebody else is watching them 200miles away on the same connection. That is in no way trolling. Obviously the video in home isn't as big as Blu-ray. And when did Leo-j become a plural representation of a stereotype?

Doubl Post

 

iclim4 said: sc94597 said: iclim4 said: Minutes after twesterm got me to thinking that I might have misjudged you, you're at it again. I applaud at your consistency and perseverance Fishy. But, I digress. I'll just leave this thread. Carry on FishyJoe. I don't see how that is trolling.We are all responding to Leo-js statement that you could watch blu-ray movies while somebody else is watching them 200miles away on the same connection. That is in no way trolling. Obviously the video in home isn't as big as Blu-ray. And when did Leo-j become a plural representation of a stereotype?

SSj12 also said internet connections in the near future(2009) may be able to stream blu-ray. That means more than one person(people according to fishyjoe) believe this.

 

In this thread you have people arguing that video downloading is largely irrelevant because internet speeds are too slow. Yet now that we're discussing it as a feature of home, all the sudden it's great. Yes, I call that hypocrisy.

http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=21540

FishyJoe said: In this thread you have people arguing that video downloading is largely irrelevant because internet speeds are too slow. Yet now that we're discussing it as a feature of home, all the sudden it's great. Yes, I call that hypocrisy. http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=21540

Mars said: No clue. You can watch vids that are better then standard defenition, but they arent Br quality.  I guess if they can stream a PS3 game on to the PSP its possible but will it be full HD i dont know.

There is a difference.

@sc95597
Leo-j was obviously misinformed about how home works.
Also it was a hit and run, how can you prove he truely believed the average internet speed can stream Br quality movies in home?
Also, he didn't even post in the thread Fishy provided.

Let me re-do my question.
When did ssj12 become a plural representation, since he seems to be the only one who had the change in stance?(correct me if I'm wrong)

About me leaving the thread?
I lied.
It's obvious at this point, but I can't resist replying. >_<

Mars said: Theres nothing like racing GT online then arguing some dude in GT home about what just happened. i cant wait to start all the Lexus is better then BMW or Benz arguments.

wow, in what way is lexus better than BMW? because it can parallel park itself. how would that help in a racing game?

 

 

wow. im confuzed.

how did this internet speed thing come up? the opening shows conderns bout delays, not speed lol

anyways keep tlking its interesting

CaptainPrefrences said: wow. im confuzed. how did this internet speed thing come up? the opening shows conderns bout delays, not speed lol anyways keep tlking its interesting

I blame wiifit leo-j.

 

iclim4 said: FishyJoe said: In this thread you have people arguing that video downloading is largely irrelevant because internet speeds are too slow. Yet now that we're discussing it as a feature of home, all the sudden it's great. Yes, I call that hypocrisy. http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=21540 Mars said: No clue. You can watch vids that are better then standard defenition, but they arent Br quality. I guess if they can stream a PS3 game on to the PSP its possible but will it be full HD i dont know. There is a difference. @sc95597 Leo-j was obviously misinformed about how home works. Also it was a hit and run, how can you prove he truely believed the average internet speed can stream Br quality movies in home? Also, he didn't even post in the thread Fishy provided. Let me re-do my question. When did ssj12 become a plural representation, since he seems to be the onlly one who had the change in stance?(correct me if I'm wrong) About me leaving the thread? I lied. It's obvious at this point, but I can't resist replying. >_<

Yeah good point, but how is it considered trolling?