By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Would Rare have been better off with Nintendo?

 

Would Rare have been better off with Nintendo?

Yes 356 87.68%
 
No 50 12.32%
 
Total:406
curl-6 said:
KLXVER said:

Well Star Fox Adventures has a 82 on Metacritic. People seem to hate it more because it has the Star Fox name in it than anything else.

I don't put much store in Metacritic.

So its just based on your own opinion of the games?



Around the Network
KLXVER said:
curl-6 said:

I don't put much store in Metacritic.

So its just based on your own opinion of the games?

i do prefer to form my own opinions rather than just conform to those of others. I don't need a website to tell me what to think.



curl-6 said:
KLXVER said:

So its just based on your own opinion of the games?

i do prefer to form my own opinions rather than just conform to those of others. I don't need a website to tell me what to think.

Well then this discussion is pointless since some people might say SFA is the best game ever made and then they would be right in that Rares quality dipped after being bought by MS.



KLXVER said:
curl-6 said:

i do prefer to form my own opinions rather than just conform to those of others. I don't need a website to tell me what to think.

Well then this discussion is pointless since some people might say SFA is the best game ever made and then they would be right in that Rares quality dipped after being bought by MS.

Discussing differing opinions isn't pointless, it's one of the key purposes of the site having a forum. Wouldn't be much point posting at all if we all agreed on everything.



curl-6 said:
KLXVER said:

Well then this discussion is pointless since some people might say SFA is the best game ever made and then they would be right in that Rares quality dipped after being bought by MS.

Discussing differing opinions isn't pointless, it's one of the key purposes of the site having a forum. Wouldn't be much point posting at all if we all agreed on everything.

Not when you are talking about stuff like this. I could say the next Mario 3D games is going to be bad because I think 3D World is bad. Not really much proof is it?



Around the Network
KLXVER said:
curl-6 said:

Discussing differing opinions isn't pointless, it's one of the key purposes of the site having a forum. Wouldn't be much point posting at all if we all agreed on everything.

Not when you are talking about stuff like this. I could say the next Mario 3D games is going to be bad because I think 3D World is bad. Not really much proof is it?

You'd be completely entitled to feel so. 3D World has diminished my own faith in the next 3D Mario.



curl-6 said:
KLXVER said:

Not when you are talking about stuff like this. I could say the next Mario 3D games is going to be bad because I think 3D World is bad. Not really much proof is it?

You'd be completely entitled to feel so. 3D World has diminished my own faith in the next 3D Mario.

Then why are you arguing this point with me? If we are all right anyway?



KLXVER said:
curl-6 said:

You'd be completely entitled to feel so. 3D World has diminished my own faith in the next 3D Mario.

Then why are you arguing this point with me? If we are all right anyway?

Because I enjoy discussing video games.



curl-6 said:
KLXVER said:

Then why are you arguing this point with me? If we are all right anyway?

Because I enjoy discussing video games.

Me too, but if everything is pure opinion, then nobody is really gaining anything.



KLXVER said:
curl-6 said:

Because I enjoy discussing video games.

Me too, but if everything is pure opinion, then nobody is really gaining anything.

I'm gaining both entertainment and learning about other people's perspectives.