By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Resident Evil 7 - Gamescom gameplay trailer.

DonFerrari on 17 August 2016

I did like the demo, and hated RE 4,5 and thought 6 was boring, and I loved from 1 to Code Veronica... so I hope to get very entertained on this one.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Around the Network
DonFerrari on 17 August 2016
Bristow9091 said:
AZWification said:

Oh, I agree with you there! I just feel like some people are being a tad bit too harsh with the game, some even saying it could the worst RE game ever made.

Ah, we've found a common ground on which we can agree upon! That's basically what I'm trying to say anyway, I think that the biggest factor that makes me feel like this shouldn't really be a Resident Evil game is the camera perspective, it just seems like a much bigger change than needed, I'm sure they could have gone the survival horror route while maintaining third person and not having to go first person, because now the game, as I've said before, comes across as a kind of Amnesia/Outlast clone or something... 

Don't get me wrong, I still don't like what I've seen or played of the game so far, but I wouldn't call it the worst Resident Evil game ever made for the simple fact that I personally wouldn't actually call it a Resident Evil game... if they named it anything else, or even made it a spin off rather than a mainline game, I'd be okay with that.

Without 1st person view perhaps VR would be too strange to make.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Wright on 17 August 2016
Shadow1980 said:
Looks like an indie horror game, not a RE game.

This doesn't look anything like Lone Survivor!



AZWification on 18 August 2016
Bristow9091 said:
AZWification said:

Oh, I agree with you there! I just feel like some people are being a tad bit too harsh with the game, some even saying it could the worst RE game ever made.

Ah, we've found a common ground on which we can agree upon! That's basically what I'm trying to say anyway, I think that the biggest factor that makes me feel like this shouldn't really be a Resident Evil game is the camera perspective, it just seems like a much bigger change than needed, I'm sure they could have gone the survival horror route while maintaining third person and not having to go first person, because now the game, as I've said before, comes across as a kind of Amnesia/Outlast clone or something... 

Don't get me wrong, I still don't like what I've seen or played of the game so far, but I wouldn't call it the worst Resident Evil game ever made for the simple fact that I personally wouldn't actually call it a Resident Evil game... if they named it anything else, or even made it a spin off rather than a mainline game, I'd be okay with that.

I have a feeling that Capcom wanted a break from the Resi 5/6 style of games. Hopefully this game will turn out well!



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---