By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Explanation for Lack of Female Hero in Zelda: Breath of the Wild Doesn’t Add Up

There obviously should be a female equivalent in every game for the main character. duh.... /s



Around the Network

Why do they even need to explain this?



Mystro-Sama said:
Why do they even need to explain this?

 

There was a rumor that this new Zelda would feature a female avatar to play with. When it was unveiled, Anouma actually explained that they considered doing something similar but ultimately took down the idea. This article actually highlights why it is considered that Anouma's explanation to not go with this idea is weak.



Everytime somebody says female link, I say male Samus.
.
.
Barf.



Jim Sterling's take on this is best.

Honestly, I wish Nintendo was just honest. You don't want to make a game with a female lead? Fine. Just say that. Your excuses are lame and make ZERO sense.

 

It's bizarre what Nintendo is conservative about vs what they CONSTANTLY try to change. They always want to come up with new controls and controllers, but they are relatively stagnant in all other aspects.



Around the Network
FragilE^ said:
Thoughts? Its from the Mary Sue. They're not game developers, they're not gamers, and they spend far too much time thinking about gender politics. I don't care about their opinions in the slightest.

/thread

Stop linking articles from this site



Honestly, I don't think it really matters, though I don't mind either way :/



NintenDomination [May 2015 - July 2017]
 

  - Official  VGChartz Tutorial Thread - 

NintenDomination [2015/05/19 - 2017/07/02]
 

          

 

 

Here lies the hidden threads. 

 | |

Nintendo Metascore | Official NintenDomination | VGC Tutorial Thread

| Best and Worst of Miiverse | Manga Discussion Thead |
[3DS] Winter Playtimes [Wii U]

Wright said:

Source is TheMarySue.com (Full article here)

Author is Jessica Lachenal

 

Explanation for Lack of Female Hero in Zelda: Breath of the Wild Doesn’t Add Up

 

[...]

According to a chat with GameSpot, Eiji Aonuma, a producer at Nintendo, said that “We thought about it, and decided that if we’re going to have a female protagonist, it’s simpler to have Princess Zelda as the main character.” [...] Aonuma went on to explain, “…if we have Princess Zelda as the main character who fights, then what is Link going to do? Taking into account that, and also the idea of the balance of the Triforce, we thought it best to come back to this [original] makeup.

The implication here is that the creative team worried more about Link’s story and identity rather than Zelda’s. It boiled down to a question that sounds a lot like, “But what about the man,” the inverse of which (“But what about the woman”) is a question that women have long since wondered to themselves. Even then, this reasoning doesn’t exclude the idea of a female version of the Hero, or Link. It might exclude the idea of Princess Zelda as a protagonist (disappointing), but how does this prevent them from creating a new character to play the hero?

The statement about “the idea of the balance of the Triforce” doesn’t make a whole lot of sense, either, and it’s hard to gather why that would also be a factor in why they didn’t include a female Link. [...] The reason just feels arbitrary, rather than thought-out or even considered.

During Nintendo Treehouse E3 Live event, much was said about defying past Zelda norms and tropes. If you ask me, one great way of actually defying those norms would be to add a female hero. [...] However, it seems like we’re a long way off from seeing a character like Linkle fronting her own Zelda game at Nintendo.

Considering most Zelda stories are non-gender-specific anyway (and given Link’s often much-parodied androgynous appearance), how much effort would it really take to build a female hero, someone that isn’t just head-canonically female but actually female?

[...]

____________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________

______________________

 

Thoughts on this?

By the CREATOR of the franchise Shigeru Miyamoto:

 

“Some people might wonder, you know, because the title is Zelda – it’s a female character – why isn’t the protagonist a female character? But really, to me, The Legend of Zelda, the main series, Link is the protagonist. So if you look at something like Hyrule Warriors, where there are multiple characters, then you know you can use different types of characters.”

 

Female link is bullshit, period. Sorry if my opinion is harsh but i'm tired of that subject.



Dyllyo said:

Jim Sterling's take on this is best.

Honestly, I wish Nintendo was just honest. You don't want to make a game with a female lead? Fine. Just say that. Your excuses are lame and make ZERO sense.

 

It's bizarre what Nintendo is conservative about vs what they CONSTANTLY try to change. They always want to come up with new controls and controllers, but they are relatively stagnant in all other aspects.

It doesn´t fit with the characters and the overarching storyline, which makes sense. The stories are about the hero (not heroine) of time who was chosen by the godess Hylia and whose incarnations basically continue the first cycle. A female version of Link doesn´t make sense in this context which is why he said that including Zelda as a playable character would be easier for them.

Zelda´s in the possession of the Triforce of Wisdom and Link is in the possession of the Triforce of Courage. How do you make it work if the game is about the heros courage overcoming the power(literally the Triforce of Power) of evil?

A spinoff or separate title would make much more sense but trying to shoehorn it into 30 years of backstory/lore just doesn´t work.



I think my head is starting to hurt.

Doesn't help that I thought Link was a girl when I was a kid.



"Just for comparison Uncharted 4 was 20x bigger than Splatoon 2. This shows the huge difference between Sony's first-party games and Nintendo's first-party games."