By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - The Wii does not = , > the PS2,PS3,360 because they are NOT THE SAME!!

jimmay on 29 March 2008
HappySqurriel said:
So jimmay, your entire argument seems to be "Find me something that disproves my point!" and when people do you put your fingers in your ears and say "Nah, nah, nah, nah ... I can't hear you!" ... Very mature!

Except nobody has proved me wrong. Nobody has posted a link to indepent scentific tests directly comparing wiimote movement to dual analog movement. Pulling out the odd review here and their from ign where wii games have been released months and years later then their 360/ps3/ps2/gc counter parts, well duh have you ever stopped and thought that maybe the controls in a few cases turned out better not because the wiimote was used but because the developers had much more time to improve the controls after what they had learnt from making the orginal game.



Around the Network
sc94597 on 29 March 2008
jimmay said:
HappySqurriel said:
So jimmay, your entire argument seems to be "Find me something that disproves my point!" and when people do you put your fingers in your ears and say "Nah, nah, nah, nah ... I can't hear you!" ... Very mature!

Except nobody has proved me wrong. Nobody has posted a link to indepent scentific tests directly comparing wiimote movement to dual analog movement. Pulling out the odd review here and their from ign where wii games have been released months and years later then their 360/ps3/ps2/gc counter parts, well duh have you ever stopped and thought that maybe the controls in a few cases turned out better not because the wiimote was used but because the developers had much more time to improve the controls after what they had learnt from making the orginal game.


 Well you haven't proven me or any others wrong. Get too it. I doubt you could find anything to support this. 



FishyJoe on 29 March 2008

In my perfectly scientific test with a sampling of one, I found the controls of Metroid to be fun as heck. If that's not proof, well then stuff it.



HappySqurriel on 29 March 2008
jimmay said:
HappySqurriel said:
So jimmay, your entire argument seems to be "Find me something that disproves my point!" and when people do you put your fingers in your ears and say "Nah, nah, nah, nah ... I can't hear you!" ... Very mature!

Except nobody has proved me wrong. Nobody has posted a link to indepent scentific tests directly comparing wiimote movement to dual analog movement. Pulling out the odd review here and their from ign where wii games have been released months and years later then their 360/ps3/ps2/gc counter parts, well duh have you ever stopped and thought that maybe the controls in a few cases turned out better not because the wiimote was used but because the developers had much more time to improve the controls after what they had learnt from making the orginal game.


Ok, please show me a link to an independent website that proves that Unicorns do not exist!

The fact of the matter is that reviews from major sites like IGN are about the only unbiased sources we have that will do a direct comparison of the Wiimote to the Dual analogue; asking for more than that is basically making an unreasonable request from people you are arguing with.

For the most part, none of the games I mentioned had a lot of development time devoted to the Wii version and the developer certainly did not have as much experience working with Wiimote controlls as they had with a dual analogue set up; Medal of Honor: Heroes 2 and Godfather: Blackhand Edition are both cheap ports produced by third rate development teams within EA, and none of the developers had any experience with the Wiimote before hand (unlike the dual analogue controller which has existed for well over a decade).

 



sc94597 on 29 March 2008
HappySqurriel said:
jimmay said:
HappySqurriel said:
So jimmay, your entire argument seems to be "Find me something that disproves my point!" and when people do you put your fingers in your ears and say "Nah, nah, nah, nah ... I can't hear you!" ... Very mature!

Except nobody has proved me wrong. Nobody has posted a link to indepent scentific tests directly comparing wiimote movement to dual analog movement. Pulling out the odd review here and their from ign where wii games have been released months and years later then their 360/ps3/ps2/gc counter parts, well duh have you ever stopped and thought that maybe the controls in a few cases turned out better not because the wiimote was used but because the developers had much more time to improve the controls after what they had learnt from making the orginal game.


Ok, please show me a link to an independent website that proves that Unicorns do not exist!

The fact of the matter is that reviews from major sites like IGN are about the only unbiased sources we have that will do a direct comparison of the Wiimote to the Dual analogue; asking for more than that is basically making an unreasonable request from people you are arguing with.

For the most part, none of the games I mentioned had a lot of development time devoted to the Wii version and the developer certainly did not have as much experience working with Wiimote controlls as they had with a dual analogue set up; Medal of Honor: Heroes 2 and Godfather: Blackhand Edition are both cheap ports produced by third rate development teams within EA, and none of the developers had any experience with the Wiimote before hand (unlike the dual analogue controller which has existed for well over a decade).

 

Well mohh2 being a port still has controls almost at the level of prime 3.

 



Around the Network
jimmay on 29 March 2008

This one goes out to everybody because posting to several different people about the same thing is pretty boring. It's a FACT that every wii i have ever played has a small amount of lag that makes it less accurate than dual analog controls. You can argue with me till you are blue in the face but you'll never change that. Nobody i have ever spoken to in real life has said that the wiimote is more accurate and the only place i see people saying the wiimote is better is on the internet. I have not seen a single piece of independent proof proving the wiimote is more accurate than dual analog and when i ask for people to post CONCLUSIVE proof people don't. And why don't they post it? Because they have never seen any proof, because people can't prove me wrong by posting conclusive proof they get annoyed and try and make me post something when i don't have to. IM the one who asked for proof and unless somebody posts some then i can't be bothered to go searching the internet for any either.



HappySqurriel on 29 March 2008
jimmay said:
This one goes out to everybody because posting to several different people about the same thing is pretty boring. It's a FACT that every wii i have ever played has a small amount of lag that makes it less accurate than dual analog controls. You can argue with me till you are blue in the face but you'll never change that. Nobody i have ever spoken to in real life has said that the wiimote is more accurate and the only place i see people saying the wiimote is better is on the internet. I have not seen a single piece of independent proof proving the wiimote is more accurate than dual analog and when i ask for people to post CONCLUSIVE proof people don't. And why don't they post it? Because they have never seen any proof, because people can't prove me wrong by posting conclusive proof they get annoyed and try and make me post something when i don't have to. IM the one who asked for proof and unless somebody posts some then i can't be bothered to go searching the internet for any either.

 

Forum > Rules

  • Do not post only that Item A sucks, or that Item B is better than Item C. Give reasons why, post links to documented problems, of screenshots, or whatever you can. Similarly, do not reply to other posters with "you're wrong." Explain why you disagree, and perhaps point to the correct answer.  

    • People have provided adequate support to their side of the argument, you have failed to; if you're not going to follow the forum rules maybe you should leave or be banned ...



    sc94597 on 29 March 2008
    jimmay said:
    This one goes out to everybody because posting to several different people about the same thing is pretty boring. It's a FACT that every wii i have ever played has a small amount of lag that makes it less accurate than dual analog controls. You can argue with me till you are blue in the face but you'll never change that. Nobody i have ever spoken to in real life has said that the wiimote is more accurate and the only place i see people saying the wiimote is better is on the internet. I have not seen a single piece of independent proof proving the wiimote is more accurate than dual analog and when i ask for people to post CONCLUSIVE proof people don't. And why don't they post it? Because they have never seen any proof, because people can't prove me wrong by posting conclusive proof they get annoyed and try and make me post something when i don't have to. IM the one who asked for proof and unless somebody posts some then i can't be bothered to go searching the internet for any either.

     IF you are going to say you believe it's not more accurate based on what you played, that doesn't mean we can't say the  opposite, based on what we played. Your hypocritsy lvl is really high. We ask you for links after we provide the best we could give you yet you don't give us any. 



    FJ-Warez on 29 March 2008
    jimmay said:
    It's a FACT that every wii i have ever played has a small amount of lag that makes it less accurate than dual analog controls. You can argue with me till you are blue in the face but you'll never change that.

    Opinion, he made his mind, he can't be wrong. Lol...



    By me:

    Made with Blender + LuxRender
    "Since you can´t understand ... there is no point to taking you seriously."
    sc94597 on 29 March 2008

    We should make a new thread that takes a poll on how accurate the wii controls are.