Puppyroach said:
I can´t say I really agree fully. I agree that they wan´t people to move to W10 but it´s is extremely costly to maintain several OS´s with updates, development cost and new services, especially if you own the largest PC OS in the world by a long shot. Us consumers as a group would benefit greatly if MS could focus only on one OS at a time and put all their resources into it. And MS knows that the competition has grown and that mobile and tablet OS´s binds the users to their OS, making them a competition to Windows. And the likes of Google apply many of the same tactics as MS does right now, because maintaing several OS´s isn´t cost efficient.
|
It's not even several OS's they have to deal with, it;s just 7 and 8 they deal with. THey aren't strapped for cash at all when it comes to dishing out a few patches par the course with any OS mind you, they splash out money like no ones business so we definitely cannot call MS a poor company that needs to keep it;s eyes tightly on that pool of cash.
They don't even need to dish out the same services on 7-8, just making sure that the games work on 7-8 is more than enough, unless of course we go with the forced monopoly route a la the Windows 10 store which is of course the absolute only way to play anything MS related on PC in recent years and that shows just how little options they have created for us as consumers, that is to say not a great idea disagreement or not.
We would benefit greatly from a one world order, from having one type of currency, one type of everything in this world, but we all don't want that and we certainly don't want just a single OS in the PC space either.
Google just updates through the versions of Android, not in the same exact way MS does for Windows since we've only had 9 versions of those and way more different tiny versions of Android.
Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.