She also said it hard to say because it's like comparing apples and oranges. She also hinted Nvidia, and Nvidia have better performance than AMD even on paper they look same.

If Nvidia making custom cheap just for them they don't need to announce, especially because NX is not revealed yet.

I think it will be as powerfull as the Xbox One, it will use ARM architecture to get mobile multiplats and to make the handheld and console compatible. The launch price should be 200$ at this point, maybe it will be cheap enough to ad another gamepad again as technology progresses

Plot twist, half of its power it's used to support a mandatory Gamepad succesor, games end up looking worse than the ones on the Wii U.

The only thing I'm worried is whether the 3rd parties are going to care about that power or not. After all, if they don't support the system, why would Nintendo need that much power anyway? Focus on the shared library first to grow your userbase and then care about power.

I really hope that Nintendo targets a 399 Euro price and deliver a 4-6 TF Home Console :)

I don't really buy Digitimes' reporting, they've been wrong multiple times in the past, I think they are just fishing for clicks.

Not that you need a super powered console for VR anyway, the Samsung Gear runs VR off mobile phone chips.

Whatever the Nintendo console is, I think it won't be weak compared to the X1 and PS4, but will be weak compared to the Neo and Scorpio. I don't think Nintendo saw this move coming from Sony or MS and were hoping when they began to R&D to create something that was close to the current gen consoles.

Even if it has VR, it doesn't mean it will be a powerful console. There is cheap VR out there like the moulds you slot your phone into. Nintendo could very much create a streaming up (with all the streaming rumours) and have you plug your phone into a mould to watch the game in VR or play it.

Either way it will be interesting if they decide to launch between the Neo and Scorpio.

such hogwash, Emily Rogers has never released any big suprising rumors. She's 'leaked' things that people almost always have been talking about or suggesting wayyyyyy before her. anyone reading into what she says is being silly.

no one who's signed a NDA way in advance is going to risk their careers and lives (economically / lawsuit) just to tell some random nobody on Twitter. sorry, not going to happen.

in fact people veryyyy rarely break NDA's with big companies like Nintendo about something like hardware. Its extremely rare and it certainly wouldn't be Emily Rogers who would have the scoop

A Radeon 440/450 is likely to be a rebadged GPU from the last 4+ years and not Polaris. The only new chips this round is the Radeon 480 and 470 series.

Polaris 11 should be the sucessor to the Radeon 7850/7870/265/270/370 chips.
Below that line expect Bonair and Oland to be repurposed/rebadged, maybe a sprinkling of Cape Verde... Which means Xbox One levels.

Mobile chips are already exceeding 600Gflop.
Tegra X1 is doing 1024Gflop.

nVidia's Tegra X1 successor will also get a drop down to 16nm and will have a Pascal derived GPU and should step things up again, probably considerably.

But... Just because a mobile device is doing 1 Teraflop, doesn't mean it can be compared to the Xbox One in terms of graphics or performance, they render things differently, have different memory subsystems, completely different CPU ISA, memory amounts, the works.

Doubt it.

nVidia would be under NDA. Nintendo typically despises releasing technical information, ever.

It doesn't need to be an ARM chip in order to get mobile multiplatforms, Intel processors are perfectly capable of running Android and thus the entire  Android software ecosystem using a few tricks such as Binary Translation.

Even if it only had 64Mb of Ram?

More to performance than just how many Teraflops it has.

*****

For me personally, if I want power I'll stick to PC gaming.
What I want for Nintendo to do is drop the silly controller gimmicks and I will be onboard.