I'll usually chuckle at jokes about straight people(i.e cheesy pick up lines and such). gay jokes are funny as well, as long as it isn't a repetitive joke.

I disagree, all of the examples in the OP are bad.

Lemme think. Making critical comments and jokes about a currently and or historically oppressed demographic, by a member of the demographic who used to be, or still is, the oppressor is more likely to be objectively offensive and inappropropriate and assholish than being critical or making jokes about the oppressor demographic. Seems pretty legit to me. I don't really understand why people don't get this. But still making broad negative generalisations about the worth of any demographic group is, generally, entirely inappropriate and is pretty much never absolutely fine. Which is why even if some of the exmaples in the OP are less badly wrong than others, they are all still wrong.

Humour does not exist in a vaccuum and it can be used to further belittle and denigrate an already disadvantaged group, or person.

Does that mean that I can make jokes about Asians then? Since I'm not part of the oppressor demographic, as you call them.

Trust me, i have tried my entire life not to be hypocritical and stay by my principles no matter what... It's so damn exhausting, and after a while you can't do anything at all without going against your own morale code.. Sometimes we need to rebel against ourselves to at least have some fun.. We can't simply limit ourselves to a certain standard,
It's simply better to give a shit about the most of it cause it's not worth our energy.. No matter how strong we can be with standing by our morale-codes, we will sooner or later end up breaking one of them because them all are complicated, it's connected to so many threads that when you pass them, you won't know which one you stepped on. The solution is simply empathy and sympathy, that if we all cared for each-other, all this wouldn't have been a problem, because our focus would be less about ourselves and our opinion, we rather pay attention on making this world a better place.. I will probably do something tomorrow that somehow will go against that, cause again, it's a complex matter and there are millions of different path's that leads towards hypocritical moment's, i don't think people actually wish for it, it just happens cause we can't think though everything we do and say at all time.. Also, people are also good to misunderstand things..

I do wish that the examples you gave, weren't true cause they are some-what pretty harmful judgmental things to do.

Humour is the last thing I care about. As I said, it's when we reach serious conversations does this double standard effect truly take place.

Look at the cases of Muslims and black people. Face it, we have an issue with some black people and some Muslims. however, people just say "it's not all of them" and drop the issue. However, if it were with a different group, people will explode and go nuts.

Your last point is also what I'm trying to say. I don't like being mean to anyone at all. I'd rather be respectful than rude to people for no reason.

What? Y'know women do generally avoid places where they think there's a higher than normal danger of being raped, so they are practicing common sense. But if course if you're expecting them to avoid all places where there is a non-zero chance of being raped then they will need to pretty much live in solitary confinement.

What most ignorant people say to rape victims is, "well you shouldn't have worn a skimpy dress", which is a total BS statement.

Most people who get stabbed in a bar aren't getting stabbed at random, there's usually some aggro between the stabber and the stabbee (both are being antagonistic) before the situation escalates into a stabbing.

Now if your second sentence was "She was at that seedy bar downtown was not wearing underware, sat on the bar spread her legs and said, hey boys who wants some of this, and got raped. She really needs to stop doing that." Then you might have something of a point.

Basically what your exampe boils down to is this statement "you shouldn't antagonise the one with the knife." exactly equals in common sense the statement "you shouldn't flirt with the one with a penis." Now that is plain nonsense.

And then of course there's the general attitude in society that violence, even killing, is an acceptable and reasonable response in some situations. So having a violent confrontation is often accepted as fitting within the norms of human social interaction. As far as I know in a normal society there is never a situation where forced, non-consensual sex is an acceptable and reasonable course of action that fits within the norms of social interaction. Happy to be corrected if I'm wrong.

It's the great hypocrisy of liberalism. They will scorn you for stereotyping then stereotype Republicans. For instance, a crazy Muslim person blows up an airport. Their first response is to not stereotype and that this is such a small fraction. Meanwhile a crazy Republican blows up an abortion clinic. Their first response is to say that this represents conservatism as a whole and all the others are just more tame about it and like this somehow.

You do give a good point.

Also, the points I give are ones I see quite often. Goes to show how divided we are nowadays

I don't care about the examples you give. What bothers me is how people can't take jokes anymore. We need to stop acting as if jokes constitute opinions or ideologies. Comedy is satire. Stereotypes are used in satire. And it's all just humor. Not real opinions.

What?  Your victim blaming sickens me.  God, what the hell, dude?  Guy gets stabbed and it's his own fault?  Serves him right for wearing that hoodie, huh?  I bet he had some tattoos, that's the same as just asking for it.

Seriously, thank you for coming along and providing a real world example of people going out of their way to rationalize hypothetical situations two completely different ways, even to the point of making up their own details so that one is more negative and one is more positive.  You've twisted it until the guy deserved to be stabbed just because you wanted to.

And, wow, "you shouldn't antagonise the one with the knife"?  Because stabbings are never done when someone's back is turned?  

Here, though, I'll give you the conclusion of the example: the guy got stabbed because he was trying to stop the girl from being raped.  Still his own fault for messing with a person who had a concealed knife?  Still want to apply two different sets of logic?