Zelda by a landslide. The Legend of Zelda has brought innovation to the fromula multiple times throughout its existence. The Witcher, as far as i know, didn't ever.

You're comparing a piece of DLC for a game that's been out around a year to a full fledged AAA $60 retail game that we know absolutely nothing about. Length issues aside, that still doesn't seem quite fair, even ignoring the fact that the DLC is $25 and is for a PS4/X1/PC game against a Wii U/system that we have no idea if it's going to sell well game.

This is how I feel. We need more Zelda information. Nintendo is really pushing it right now.

cause war, war never changes.

I've spent a good 400hrs+ into the Witcher trilogy.

I've played Zelda 3 A Link to The past to death on SNES, did not like Majora's Mask, I flew past Misnish Cap on DS so fast I barely remember it, I had a blast with NGC's bundaru The Wind Waker and Ocarina of Time. I found Twilight Princess a bit meh, did not touched the last one.

The thing that I'm sure with TW3 is that it's my GOTY 2015 and stomped competition. Graphical mods push that limit to uncanny levels.
This new Zelda we know practically nothing about, will need to exceed expectations, and knowing Nintendo nowadays' strategy, it's going to be hard to be better than TW3 on graphical quality alone. On world size, and quests quality, TW3 was awesome, but Nintendo did similar or better in the past.

So tough match in perspective, but for the moment, TW3 is winning !

Zelda for me. Played through The Witcher 2 and it was ok at best imo...

I went 150 hours into the first playthrough back when the game first dropped last year. Im goin to play again with the expansion so that will definitely be over  well over 200+ hours in completionist mode. New game plus is going to be so sweet!

Can't say. I'm not a fan of the Witcher.

"Both similar Artstyle"

What the hell are you even talking about?

Can i pick Dragon Age?