By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Roll Call - A Feast of Crows

bigtakilla on 01 May 2016
Shadow8 said:
Teeqoz said:

Lol, am I the only one that gets a post-apocalyptic audio log vibe from these short messages? Like in Fallout, you walk around and you find a small recording by a person, and slowly but surely you figure out what actually went down (I'm not sure if this actually happens in Fallout, but this is the sort of vibe I'm getting).

 

You should write a little story out of it, but a story where at first, we have no clue what's going on, but eventually the story unravels. I'd read that.

Sounds like a good idea! Should make it a thread so others can read it and call it something like...I dont know "The Crow Journals"

Bigtakilla also mentioned something similar so it seems like it could get some attention :P

I'd go with The Crow-nicles of Shadow8, or Shadow8 Caw-nicles.



Around the Network
Shadow8 on 01 May 2016
bigtakilla said:
Shadow8 said:

Sounds like a good idea! Should make it a thread so others can read it and call it something like...I dont know "The Crow Journals"

Bigtakilla also mentioned something similar so it seems like it could get some attention :P

I'd go with The Crow-nicles of Shadow8, or Shadow8 Caw-nicles.

Ohh, I like the sound of the first one! I'll get thinking of the story during the week and see if I can make a rough draft by Friday.



 

Hynad on 01 May 2016

This "event" did at least put into light the dishonesty of many users on VGC. The length some of those go to spin things around, just to evade the bet or the fact they were wrong. It at least taught us a little more about their character and ego, and who you can't trust. People should definitely remember them for future such events. Most likely ignoring/dismissing them entirely if they ever take part in any other such things.



fatslob-:O on 01 May 2016

In the words of what OP said before, "Put your money where your mouth is" ...

This implies that that there were always stakes to begin with ...



bigtakilla on 01 May 2016
RolStoppable said:
fatslob-:O said:

In the words of what OP said before, "Put your money where your mouth is" ...

This implies that that there were always stakes to begin with ...

It's time to let it go, slob.

Miguel_Zorro, who would be willing to enforce the "bet" (he already edited my signature, after all), got called out by a neutral observer in another thread and could not refute either of the two key points:

1. There was no bet to begin with, because there was a failure to establish clear rules as well as commitment to a bet.
2. The longwinded arguments that led to the creation of the Civil War thread were oversimplified by making the whole issue a binary thing. It's just not right that the side who said that the Wii U won't get any more games should be considered wrong while people who believed that there would be more Wii U first party support should be considered right.

That means it's over.

Why in the world would the amount of wii u games yet to be released (which still can't be proven honestly) have any impact on a bet of the NX release? Lol. 

Oh, because every other arguement crumbled.



Around the Network
fatslob-:O on 01 May 2016
RolStoppable said:

It's time to let it go, slob.

Miguel_Zorro, who would be willing to enforce the "bet" (he already edited my signature, after all), got called out by a neutral observer in another thread and could not refute either of the two key points:

1. There was no bet to begin with, because there was a failure to establish clear rules as well as commitment to a bet.
2. The longwinded arguments that led to the creation of the Civil War thread were oversimplified by making the whole issue a binary thing. It's just not right that the side who said that the Wii U won't get any more games should be considered wrong while people who believed that there would be more Wii U first party support should be considered right.

That means it's over.

Whatever helps you and StarOcean's case ... 



bigtakilla on 01 May 2016
fatslob-:O said:
RolStoppable said:

It's time to let it go, slob.

Miguel_Zorro, who would be willing to enforce the "bet" (he already edited my signature, after all), got called out by a neutral observer in another thread and could not refute either of the two key points:

1. There was no bet to begin with, because there was a failure to establish clear rules as well as commitment to a bet.
2. The longwinded arguments that led to the creation of the Civil War thread were oversimplified by making the whole issue a binary thing. It's just not right that the side who said that the Wii U won't get any more games should be considered wrong while people who believed that there would be more Wii U first party support should be considered right.

That means it's over.

Whatever helps you and StarOcean's case ... 

I mean really.... It's come down to Wii U releases...



fatslob-:O on 01 May 2016
bigtakilla said:

I mean really.... It's come down to Wii U releases...

You do have to admit that your initial pretext isn't exactly accurate like rol and the others said but that can be left to another thread, this thread is for those that need to sport a crow in their avatar ...



bigtakilla on 01 May 2016
fatslob-:O said:
bigtakilla said:

I mean really.... It's come down to Wii U releases...

You do have to admit that your initial pretext isn't exactly accurate like rol and the others said but that can be left to another thread, this thread is for those that need to sport a crow in their avatar ...

If you think that, you haven't been keeping up. PM me if you want the details.



fatslob-:O on 01 May 2016
bigtakilla said:

If you think that, you haven't been keeping up.

Then remind me of your primary argument later on ...