Roll Call - A Feast of Crows

[bigtakilla]

RolStoppable said:

fatslob-:O said:

In the words of what OP said before, "Put your money where your mouth is" ...

This implies that that there were always stakes to begin with ...

It's time to let it go, slob.

Miguel_Zorro, who would be willing to enforce the "bet" (he already edited my signature, after all), got called out by a neutral observer in another thread and could not refute either of the two key points:

1. There was no bet to begin with, because there was a failure to establish clear rules as well as commitment to a bet.
2. The longwinded arguments that led to the creation of the Civil War thread were oversimplified by making the whole issue a binary thing. It's just not right that the side who said that the Wii U won't get any more games should be considered wrong while people who believed that there would be more Wii U first party support should be considered right.

That means it's over.

Why in the world would the amount of wii u games yet to be released (which still can't be proven honestly) have any impact on a bet of the NX release? Lol. 

Oh, because every other arguement crumbled.