fatslob-:O said:
RolStoppable said:
It's time to let it go, slob.
Miguel_Zorro, who would be willing to enforce the "bet" (he already edited my signature, after all), got called out by a neutral observer in another thread and could not refute either of the two key points:
1. There was no bet to begin with, because there was a failure to establish clear rules as well as commitment to a bet.
2. The longwinded arguments that led to the creation of the Civil War thread were oversimplified by making the whole issue a binary thing. It's just not right that the side who said that the Wii U won't get any more games should be considered wrong while people who believed that there would be more Wii U first party support should be considered right.
That means it's over.
|
Whatever helps you and StarOcean's case ...
|
I mean really.... It's come down to Wii U releases...
