| sales2099 said: As a fan of the 64 game, can someone give me a quick summary of why its meta is what it is? Not willing to read through all these replies, thx. |
I see many people complaining about the control scheme, and also the game being very short, even with the challenge missions involved :O.
PSn - greencactaur
Nintendo Switch FC - SW - 5152 - 6393 - 5140 Please feel free to add me :)
greencactaur said:
I see many people complaining about the control scheme, and also the game being very short, even with the challenge missions involved :O. |
Odd, since the 64 game was "short" but better through replayability of its braches. I guess what held up in the 90's doesn't do much in 2016 haha
Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles.
FPS on Corneria stage so fuckin bad.
| spemanig said: I can't believe I'm about to say this, but the gyro aiming isn't that bad. I'm starting mission 2. |
Arwing is great for me. But I definitely have to work on the other vehicles xD
85,673 
sales2099 said:
Odd, since the 64 game was "short" but better through replayability of its braches. I guess what held up in the 90's doesn't do much in 2016 haha |
Unfortunately, that seems to be the case.
http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox/halo-combat-evolved
http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/halo-combat-evolved-anniversary
http://www.metacritic.com/game/nintendo-64/perfect-dark
http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/perfect-dark
It's frustrating for me, since I think a great game is a great game is a great game, and technological advances don't do much, if anything, to diminish the classics.
As for SF0, the major complaints are motion controls, lackluster graphics, and a general paucity of content. As for the first critcism, it really depends on the user. I love the motion controls; others hate them. As for graphics, they do look rather ancient. As for content, I think the criticism is unfounded. If you found plenty of content in Star Fox Zero, you'll find the same for SF0.
Veknoid_Outcast said:
Well, on that front I agree with you (and Soundwave above). Nintendo has mismanaged the franchise, and hasn't done enough to build up the brand. I also love your Zelda/Jet Force Gemini game idea. You could do something that's a mix of Star Fox, Rogue Squadron, and even Mass Effect. I would buy that game in a heartbeat :) |
This is how they can gettheir shit together - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XkhPXXbPXY
What a bullshit, you can't play missions in co-op until you finished all of them alone. Argh!
71
It went down to 71 on Metacritic. Update the title!
Veknoid_Outcast said:
Unfortunately, that seems to be the case. http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox/halo-combat-evolved http://www.metacritic.com/game/nintendo-64/perfect-dark It's frustrating for me, since I think a great game is a great game is a great game, and technological advances don't do much, if anything, to diminish the classics. As for SF0, the major complaints are motion controls, lackluster graphics, and a general paucity of content. As for the first critcism, it really depends on the user. I love the motion controls; others hate them. As for graphics, they do look rather ancient. As for content, I think the criticism is unfounded. If you found plenty of content in Star Fox Zero, you'll find the same for SF0. |
Standards were much lower back then. That's why. Especially in that generation.
85,673
spemanig said:
Standards were much lower back then. That's why. Especially in that generation. |
I'd argue the opposite. I think game design, and standards with it, have declined since the 4th, 5th, and 6th generations.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
