By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - In retrospect, who won E3 2015?

 

In retrospect, who won E3 2015

Microsoft 110 15.01%
 
Sony 553 75.44%
 
Nintendo 70 9.55%
 
Total:733
BMaker11 on 09 April 2016
LudicrousSpeed said:
BMaker11 said:

Ok, instead of just ignoring the entire point I was making (twice), I'll reduce it to a simple question: will you or will you not admit that what you're saying is that MS won E3 2015 because games from old announcements have released? And if that's not what you're saying (don't want it to be perceived as a loaded question) then clarify.

The "much larger chunk of what they showed" and the games you "give points to for being out and playable now" are what you, yourself, have said is the reason you believe MS had the best conference. But those games were announced years ago and have been shown multiple times. So, yes or no: you think they won because announcements from years ago finally released?

Simple question. 

 

PS: when I said "new criteria for winning", I wasn't saying that that's what you were talking about it, in particular. It was just a conclusion one would come to after based on your comments. 

I think MS won E3 because lots of what they showed is out and was quite good. As I have said already. Whatever you want to twist that into or over analyze looking for whatever you're looking for, be my guest LOL.

Man, you dodge questions worse than Donald Trump LOL. But we can deduce from here: 99% of the "lots of what they showed" are games that were announced years ago.

So, to answer my question: yes. They won because of old announcements finally releasing. Thanks for answering, despite trying to get around it. 

Halo 5, Rise of the Tomb Raider, Quantum Break, etc. are, indeed, games that were announced years ago. And they (amongst other games) are the reasons you believe MS won E3. Ergo, you believe they won because of old announcements. That's not "twisting", that's not "overanalyzing". That's just logic. Ever heard of a syllogism? It's a very simple concept and doesn't take much "analyzing" to understand. And here's the one that applies here:

Major premise: MS won because games like Halo, Tomb Raider, and Quantum Break were shown and have released.

Minor premise: Halo, Tomb Raider, and Quantum Break are games that were announced years ago.

Conclusion: MS won because of games that were announced years ago were shown and have released

Do you believe that "All liquids are wet. Water is a liquid. Therefore water is wet" is an "overanalyzation"? LOL. If not, then we're on the same page, and you just cheekily misspoke before. But that's ok.                                                                                                                              



Around the Network
PwerlvlAmy on 09 April 2016

sony by far, mainly because of TLG,Shenmue 3 and FF7R, thats all that i really needed

maybe im easy to please



NND: 0047-7271-7918 | XBL: Nights illusion | PSN: GameNChick

AlphaOmegaSin on 09 April 2016

They may be niche, but FFVII, The Last Guardian, and Shenmue 3 all made a lot of people extremely happy. TLG, in particular, almost made me piss my self with sheer excitement. Pair that with the fact that both Horizon and Dreams look like winners and the Uncharted 4 and No Man's Sky gameplay demos they showed is what really started to get me hyped for those games and I can't go with anyone but Sony.

Microsoft's was pretty good too, but I was supremely disappointed with Nintendo.



LudicrousSpeed on 09 April 2016

I gave my answer, didn't dodge a single thing :) When the games were announced is 100% irrelevant to anything I have said.



Bryank75 on 09 April 2016
LudicrousSpeed said:
I gave my answer, didn't dodge a single thing :) When the games were announced is 100% irrelevant to anything I have said.



Around the Network
Bryank75 on 09 April 2016
Versus_Evil said:
So reading through the thread and the same user being discredited and ganged up on over and over, if I was to say Microsoft won because I thought Sony had a rubbish showing, FF ive never liked and ive never played shenmue and Microsoft had by far the best showing because I preferred what they showed would I to get the same 4 users ganging up on me?...

You are very entitled to your view and will not be "ganged up on", it is just that LudicrousSpeed is well known for his love of Xbox. So it is no surprise that he went that way and we are just taking a friendly jab at that!

 

He is obviously entitled to his views too.



Ultrashroomz on 09 April 2016

All right everyone, we get it.

Can we please stop ganging up on a single person just because his opinion is radically different from others?



"Just for comparison Uncharted 4 was 20x bigger than Splatoon 2. This shows the huge difference between Sony's first-party games and Nintendo's first-party games."

Paatar on 09 April 2016

I fucking loved the muppets from Nintendo... but the content they provided is what sucked.

I think Sony did out of those three.



[Switch Friend code: 3909-3991-4970]

[Xbox Live: JissuWolfe]

[PSN: Jissu]

mornelithe on 09 April 2016
Ultrashroomz said:
All right everyone, we get it.

Can we please stop ganging up on a single person just because his opinion is radically different from others?

What?  593 votes, and there are what, 3 people actively or loosely talking to him?  And now 3 people including a mod sticking up for him?  I saw people get ganged up on in school, this is not being ganged up on.



Bryank75 on 09 April 2016
Versus_Evil said:
Bryank75 said:

You are very entitled to your view and will not be "ganged up on", it is just that LudicrousSpeed is well known for his love of Xbox. So it is no surprise that he went that way and we are just taking a friendly jab at that!

 

He is obviously entitled to his views too.

If that's true then why take a " friendly jab" at him at all.

It's all in good fun but I will stop any more of the nonsense from here out.