In retrospect, who won E3 2015?

[BMaker11]

LudicrousSpeed said:

BMaker11 said:

Ok, instead of just ignoring the entire point I was making (twice), I'll reduce it to a simple question: will you or will you not admit that what you're saying is that MS won E3 2015 because games from old announcements have released? And if that's not what you're saying (don't want it to be perceived as a loaded question) then clarify.

The "much larger chunk of what they showed" and the games you "give points to for being out and playable now" are what you, yourself, have said is the reason you believe MS had the best conference. But those games were announced years ago and have been shown multiple times. So, yes or no: you think they won because announcements from years ago finally released?

Simple question. 

 

PS: when I said "new criteria for winning", I wasn't saying that that's what you were talking about it, in particular. It was just a conclusion one would come to after based on your comments. 

I think MS won E3 because lots of what they showed is out and was quite good. As I have said already. Whatever you want to twist that into or over analyze looking for whatever you're looking for, be my guest LOL.

Man, you dodge questions worse than Donald Trump LOL. But we can deduce from here: 99% of the "lots of what they showed" are games that were announced years ago.

So, to answer my question: yes. They won because of old announcements finally releasing. Thanks for answering, despite trying to get around it. 

Halo 5, Rise of the Tomb Raider, Quantum Break, etc. are, indeed, games that were announced years ago. And they (amongst other games) are the reasons you believe MS won E3. Ergo, you believe they won because of old announcements. That's not "twisting", that's not "overanalyzing". That's just logic. Ever heard of a syllogism? It's a very simple concept and doesn't take much "analyzing" to understand. And here's the one that applies here:

Major premise: MS won because games like Halo, Tomb Raider, and Quantum Break were shown and have released.

Minor premise: Halo, Tomb Raider, and Quantum Break are games that were announced years ago.

Conclusion: MS won because of games that were announced years ago were shown and have released

Do you believe that "All liquids are wet. Water is a liquid. Therefore water is wet" is an "overanalyzation"? LOL. If not, then we're on the same page, and you just cheekily misspoke before. But that's ok.