By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - VR sexual imagery and pornography with video game assets. Ethically fucked?

 

It is in my opinion...

Needs to be avoidable, somehow. 15 15.00%
 
Unavoidable. 78 78.00%
 
I have yet to form an opinion. 7 7.00%
 
Total:100

Everybody and his dog will f**k virtual Emma Watson! YAYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!1!!!!!!!11!!!!!!!!!!ONE!!!!!!!ELEVEN!!!!!!!!!!!!



Stwike him, Centuwion. Stwike him vewy wuffly! (Pontius Pilate, "Life of Brian")
A fart without stink is like a sky without stars.
TGS, Third Grade Shooter: brand new genre invented by Kevin Butler exclusively for Natal WiiToo Kinect. PEW! PEW-PEW-PEW! 
 


Around the Network

Well, if they use child assets, then yes.Other then that, its just fetish.Weird, but a fetish in any case.Wouldnt be much different than people using 3D engines to make characters for a sex video or something



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1

Nautilus said:
Well, if they use child assets, then yes.Other then that, its just fetish.Weird, but a fetish in any case.Wouldnt be much different than people using 3D engines to make characters for a sex video or something

It's VR. Where is the harm? Better VR than real children.



I had no idea how "popular" Elizabeth from Bioshock was until an article from Cracked.com pointed it out. So, when this is done, how much of the assets are being used? Is any of it "original" work, in the sense that it's being created from scratch from a technical standpoint? To your question, it's a bit sketchy, but it's not for profit at least. I don't have a problem with it.



- "If you have the heart of a true winner, you can always get more pissed off than some other asshole."

LurkerJ said:
Nautilus said:
Well, if they use child assets, then yes.Other then that, its just fetish.Weird, but a fetish in any case.Wouldnt be much different than people using 3D engines to make characters for a sex video or something

It's VR. Where is the harm? Better VR than real children.

 

That kind of talk will get you fired from your job you know....



Around the Network
LurkerJ said:
Nautilus said:
Well, if they use child assets, then yes.Other then that, its just fetish.Weird, but a fetish in any case.Wouldnt be much different than people using 3D engines to make characters for a sex video or something

It's VR. Where is the harm? Better VR than real children.

Ethically speaking, of course it is.You are getting pleasure off an animation of a very young boy and/or girl.Though if you go by law, I odnt think there are any restrictions(that I know of).And in my opinion, there are certain lines that you shoudlnt cross.Sexual implications im fine with, like many animes have, but actual depiction of sexual act or imagery I find it wrong.You may say that its only fiction, and its better this than real children, but that can be a doorway for trying the real thing, much like an drug addict usually start with weak drugs, like weed, and goes to stronger ones in search of a stronger reaction.



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1

LurkerJ said:
Nautilus said:
Well, if they use child assets, then yes.Other then that, its just fetish.Weird, but a fetish in any case.Wouldnt be much different than people using 3D engines to make characters for a sex video or something

It's VR. Where is the harm? Better VR than real children.

Probably yes, although it could still be illegal in Canada and in most EU countries.



Stwike him, Centuwion. Stwike him vewy wuffly! (Pontius Pilate, "Life of Brian")
A fart without stink is like a sky without stars.
TGS, Third Grade Shooter: brand new genre invented by Kevin Butler exclusively for Natal WiiToo Kinect. PEW! PEW-PEW-PEW! 
 


I feel that pornography as a whole is ethically immoral.



If they use Nathan Drake or Chris Evans or Pietro Boselli as a VR model, my morals are going straight out of the window. :-*



If someone asks why I'm using an alt account, CGI and Truckusaurus got me a temp approval until I get my iconic and notorious "kurasakiichimaru" account back. :p

Nautilus said:
LurkerJ said:

It's VR. Where is the harm? Better VR than real children.

Ethically speaking, of course it is.You are getting pleasure off an animation of a very young boy and/or girl.Though if you go by law, I odnt think there are any restrictions(that I know of).And in my opinion, there are certain lines that you shoudlnt cross.Sexual implications im fine with, like many animes have, but actual depiction of sexual act or imagery I find it wrong.You may say that its only fiction, and its better this than real children, but that can be a doorway for trying the real thing, much like an drug addict usually start with weak drugs, like weed, and goes to stronger ones in search of a stronger reaction.

And imagination can open similar doorways for trying the real thing, lots of things do.

I don't think VR can push closted pedophiles to want to cross the line and do the real thing.

It's already established that pornography addicts have less sex with real humans thanks to porn. Who is to say VR won't have similar effects on everyone, including closeted pedophiles? 

I am not necessarily convinced with what I am saying, just playing the devil's advocate.