Doesn't look too well to reach 1bn now and that with the Chinese market so huge now. I think to stay below 1bn would be a big surprise for most if you would have asked them half a year ago what the movie will cash in.

Jesse Eisenberg was terrible, Ben Affleck was amazing, Henry Cavill was decent.

It seems to all even out.

I loved Batman VS Superman, I have seen it twice in theaters! :)
I hope it grosses as much dough as possible!

Now it probably made enough money to be slightly profitable already should make at least another $200 million world wide which might not be quiet as much as they expected but it will easily make more money then Man of Steel.

I'm just going to leave this here so you can be educated on how the movie buisness works:

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/warner-bros-mulls-releasing-films-881265.

After an abysmal run of expensive underperformers including Jupiter Ascending, Pan and In the Heart of the Sea, Warner Bros. launched its effort at a Marvel-style film universe with the DC Comics movie that had been touted as proof the regime installed in 2013 and headed by chairman and CEO Kevin Tsujihara was getting on track. But a dizzying 69 percent plunge that followed its March-record $166.1 million domestic opening ($422.5 million worldwide) means Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice is not a clear win.

Some competitors say the film may turn a profit but hardly will be the money gusher studios hope for when they pour massive resources into making a giant tentpole with a big star — with a budget in this case said to be in excess of $300 million, and Ben Affleck. "The biggest problem," says the head of a rival studio, "is that it is not turning [DC] into Marvel. The audience has communicated, as have the critics." One agent notes BvS likely won't get to $1 billion despite launching the universe with "two of the most iconic characters in history." Pointing out that Jurassic World pulled in $1.67 billion globally, he continues, "you can't tell me Batman v. Superman is so much less valuable."

Several sources say Warner Bros. executives were convinced they had the goods with BvS and were shocked when negative reviews began pouring in. Now, with DC movies dated through 2020, the outcome has led to a flurry of rumors that the studio will make adjustments — maybe add a new producer? — rather than allow BvS director Zack Snyder to proceed with the two-part Justice League.

But sources with firsthand knowledge of the situation say the studio has no such plans. One says the filmmakers naturally will evaluate what went wrong with BvS, but when it comes to Justice League, "we're not going to take a movie that's supposed to be one thing and turn it into a copycat of something else."

Warners could have some bright spots this year. Suicide Squad (Aug. 5) might be the fan hit the DC universe needs. The studio will have a potential draw for adults with Eastwood's hero pilot pic Sully (Sept. 9). And on Nov. 18, Warners will launch what seems its surest four-quadrant bet, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them. But, notes analyst Steve Birenberg of Northlake Capital Management, "Time Warner has some work ahead, and it would be helpful if the next movie in the DC relaunch were more widely praised."

Don't think it'll reach $1B mark.

It's great to see that people enjoyed the movie. One of my best friend has seen it 4 times!

Personally, they should reboot it but that's just me lol

Saw it again with a friend yesterday.

It was actually worse than I remembered. It fails as a movie about Batman or Superman, but more than that it just doesn't work great as a movie in general.

Once again, it pales in comparison to even the worst of Marvel's offerings.

The Movie was Super Man ;)

.. I gave in and watched it....

It was better than I thought it would be (I had really low expectations).
Its not a bad movie though, it just falls short... its not "good or great, fantastic" its a "okay" movie.