This game is delay-worthy!
U4 looks unreal, not sure it's running on PS4; maybe Naughty Dog is already using the next gen Nvidia GPU Pascal :D
OMG I can't wait anymore !!!!!!
”Every great dream begins with a dreamer. Always remember, you have within you the strength, the patience, and the passion to reach for the stars to change the world.”
Harriet Tubman.
New pics looks different but not particularly better. Not that it matters, since they're both from cutscenes and they haven't shown in-game images of his face. Knowing NDs track record, they probably won't ever show in-game drake so we'll have to wait until the game releases and someone turns him around in a youtube gameplay video.
| Thunderbird77 said: New pics looks different but not particularly better. Not that it matters, since they're both from cutscenes and they haven't shown in-game images of his face. Knowing NDs track record, they probably won't ever show in-game drake so we'll have to wait until the game releases and someone turns him around in a youtube gameplay video. |
It's in-game model...
It's not that surprising that there's a visual upgrade. They were originally aiming for 60 fps, and got it to around 40 fps. By dropping it to 30 fps, they had extra leeway to make it look super pretty.
Honestly, I am just a fan of how they made Nate Drake look much older. Soon enough, he will be Sully.
| Aerys said: Im t'aling ... animations |
These animations are indeed exceptional (for a game that doesn't entirely run on scripted events) , and everything else is high quality. Nevertheless, it doesn't take insanely powerful hardware to do this. As has been mentioned, a lot of the events are scripted and the context limited (as they are cinematic rather than interactive) in Uncharted games.
Different games have different priorities, and Uncharted is the type of game that isn't too limited by the PS4's hardware (or any modern hardware for that matter.)
That doesn't take from Naughty Dog's accomplishments though, as the game is quite impressive visually in almost every way, including the art-style (in my opinion.) I'd just be cautious in saying it is the most graphically impressive game in existence.
CGI-Quality said:
Hmmm...they've already shown in-game Drake and all of their previous games were't any different. |
I know they showed in-game drake but did they show more than his back, butt and back of his head/legs and up close?
The previous games never seemed to show in-game models in official videos and screenshots. Didn't they even admit recently about the differences between cutscenes and in-game models?
Lauster said:
It's in-game model... |
Untill it's proven (by showing the model during gameplay running on a ps4), it isn't.
CGI-Quality said:
There's nothing wrong with differences in the two models. And yes, there are gameplay videos of him. |
What do you mean by nothing wrong with differences? Sure, in-game models don't have to look the same as the ones in a cutscene. The problem is showing only the cutscene models and making people believe that's in-game. Could you link one of this videos?
Uabit said:
Things go well until comments like this come in. Indeed ps4 is underpowered, it is low end hardware. |
Please do not go there. Crysis maxed out is not even close to this. Crysis was a gorgeous game for its time (as all Crytek games are) but do not pretend it can even think of touching any decently optimized PS4 game.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/PXtRMGjtf-o/maxresdefault.jpg

