''Xbox Live or PSN arnt necessary for multiplayer. Ever played on a pc?'' 

Um yes.  I  mentionned controller/mouse combo as the best way for multiplayer. Still, there are entrenched communities on PSN and Xbox Live, and many people like console multiplayer. Do you expect everyone who likes multiplayer to switch from traditional console to Android, and get their multiplayer fix from the PC? What? How illogical is that?  Why would anyone do that?

I see you ignored all my other points. You're just repeating the same thing (mobile is getting stronger bla bla). I just thought of another problem about the theory of Android game boxes taking over consoles... there are too many of them!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eighth_generation_of_video_game_consoles#Other_systems

Look at how many are coming out every few months! And most of meh. That's not gonna instill confidence in the general public. IThere's too many options, limited number of games that can be streamed and they cannot do anything that consoles can't do better. Their aim is not even to compete with the consoles for the hardcore gamers. Their aim is to be able to stream media, and play games on the side. There are devices that only stream that are cheaper than the Androids and offer the same experiences on one side, and on the other side and the PS and XBox that are dedicated to gaming and do that better.

Again, Android consoles have minimal impact on the traditional home consoles. And even if it did, it's mostly only Nintendo that is being hurt. Android consoles are ideal for families with children who want a media player, and also stream casual games on a big screen. Hmmm... which of the three manufacturers specializes more in casual games and is the most family friendly... oh that's right that's Nintendo! 

I don't know how, but makes sense and doesn't make any sense at the same time

Nop, you are basing this by the fact that Sony and Ms don't have exclusive franchises that appeal to you, that's not objective at all. For me their franchises are more interesting that everything Nintendo has done in the last 15 years and looking at the sales I'm probably not the only one.

Also, could you explain to me how is PC gaming objectively dead as well? I don't see it

Bioshock was removed from the store so there's no way to know how it runs. Now, show me a game that's currently playable on an iPhone 6S that looks as good as a PS3 or PS4 game.

 Listen to yourself. Just re-read what you wrote. How can that actually make sense to you?

Now you're going to use a handheld as an example of what would happen to a Sony/MS home console if they lost third party support? A handheld that promised console quality games that never once delivered the experience? Have you considered that perhaps the reason games sold so poorly is because the concept that playing the exact same game as you can on your console, except worse in every way on a much smaller screen isn't very appealing? No. It must be the lack of third party support. It only had the likes of  franchises like Metal Gear Solid, Borderlands, Assassin's Creed, Fifa soccer, Persona, Call of Duty, Minecraft etc.  you know, some of the most popular third party franchises in the world. Big deal, right? Besides, you're cherry picking games. Uncharted and LittleBigPlanet pulled respectable numbers, and Killzone sales actually weren't too terrible either - it definitely didn't lose Sony money. Also, need I remind you that the PS Vita actually has quite a reasonably healthy following in Japan? Maybe not the best example to use  - but I digress.

Also, you're meaning to tell me that the likes of Mario Bros, Mario Kart, Smash Bros, Zelda outsold the likes of Monster Hunter and Dragon Quest on a Nintendo console?! Colour me surprised! Its almost as if those games have quite almost always sold better than Monster Hunter and Dragon Quest regardless of the platforms those games are on! But I should also probably remind you that Monster Hunter sold better on the PSP on a much smaller install base, and two of the top 3 best selling Dragon Quest games are on Sony consoles, so those are also not great examples to prove your point. Third parties don't sell as well on Nintendo consoles as they do on other consoles. It's been that way for decades. You'll be hard pressed to find a mutli-platform third party game that sells better on Nintendo than they do on Sony or MS consoles. There's a few, like Just Dance, but the vast majority sell much much better.
 
No, Nintendo's win doesn't matter because it's winning in a dwindling market. The home console base appears to be expanding in spite of Nintendo dropping the ball so badly with the Wii U, and the hand held base is shrinking dramatically despite Nintendo having virtually no competition. There were over three times as many PSPs and DSs sold at this point in their life than 3DSs and Vitas. That isn't shifting the goal posts. That's a realistic perspective. You might claim that Nintendo forced Sony out of the 3DS space, but the truth of the matter is that they read the writing on the wall that says its getting harder and harder to make a successful handheld video game console, and decided to put their time and effort into expanding their presence in an expanding market. There was more than enough room for the PSP and DS to exist, there's certainly no reason to think that the 3DS drove the Vita out of the market when the 3DS is selling less than half of its predecessor.

Sorry I had to reply this was too funy, Im rolling in the floor laughting. Altough trying to compare Shadow of the Colossus to GOW3 Titan was kinda good, mechanicaly those fights are widly different, Cronus is a living scenario basic, Shadow of the Colossus is more analogus to what happens in Dragons Dogma combat albeit its way more clunky since you know PS2 was limited as fck when compared ot a PS3/X360.

To school you just a tiny bit Ill do a very small part of your work for you, this is a direct quote form a Santa Monica dev:

“Dynamic environments mean we can take literally anything in the game, including creatures or in this case, extremely large thousand foot plus creatures,” reveals Sony Santa Monica’s John Hight, “And turn them into an environment that Kratos can now navigate, battle on, find treasures.” The idea was mooted during God of War on PS2, but only PS3’s technology allowed the developers to build it. A similar technique was employed by Naughty Dog in Uncharted 2, but Hight claims GOW3’s approach is more advanced. “Ours is a soft body collision which allows us to take any organic character, and turn it into a level. We’ve been working on it for almost two years.”

Now the Silent HIll 3 trailer to say thats the same as TloU (wich you also linked a trailer that incidentaly doesnt actualy happen in game, wich makes things even funier) was pure comedy gold, theres an abyss of mechanics, systems, animations, AI so big between TloU and Silent Hill 3 (wich isnt even a good Silent Hill game) its not even funy. If your definition of what makes TloU what it is is it has cutscenes, than heck this game could be reproduced bit by bit on a Atari, would be totaly the same game. Youre either just playing your fervorous religious card again or never played either TloU or Silent HIll to understand just how retardedly far apart these 2 games are froma  technical/technological standpoint.

the a9x is just 2 cores (a8x already was tri core).

They can easily improve performance by adding more cores and still work on the same semi conductors.

Nope. There will be similar services for android/iOS as they are on pc right now.

At the moment they are meh, right. Thats why ps4 and co are still very sucessfull now. But in the near future their chips will be on ps4-level and they will get the same multiplats like ps4/xbox one or ps5/xbox two with very similar graphical settings.

Sorry but i highly doubt you even understand my standpoint at all.

Im not. Both have exclusive franchises that are appealing to me. I have 11 Ps4 games right now, 5 are exclusives (Last of us remastered, Nathan Drake Collection, Bloodborne, Order 1886 and Until Dawn).

But those exclusives are nowhere near as POPULAR as nintendos franchises. Please learn the difference between POPULAR and my own personal preferences. 

In terms of console game sales, sony and microsofts titles dont move much consoles. People are getting the playstation and xbox to play FIFA, Call of Duty, Battlefield, Battlefront, Grand theft Auto, The Elder scrolls, Witcher, Fallout, Destiny, Assassins Creed, Batman Arkham, Metal Gear Solid and co.

In the top 10 of playstation 4 titles (sales whise) there is just one single exclusive (The last of us remastered) on rank 9.

In the top 20 there are 2 playstation exclusive titles.

Now check Wii Us top titles.

Yeah but the mobile version only has to be a on 5-6 inch screen so aliasing doesn't matter as much. The home console version can run at 1080P with AA, it doesn't matter so much on a portable, you certainly don't need 1080P for a small portable screen, hell I find for resolution 960x540 on the Vita looks perfectly fine for image quality at that ballpark of screen size. 

PowerVR already has the GT7900, that's even beyond the A9X, Nvidia likely will have the successor the Tegra X1 later this year too.