By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Website Topics - Is this website actually SFW?

Lafiel on 24 January 2016

I think sigs/avatars should simply be deactivated as standard/for guests and users can activate that if they want.



Around the Network
naruball on 24 January 2016
Lafiel said:
I think sigs/avatars should simply be deactivated as standard/for guests and users can activate that if they want.

Perfect solution, actually.





naruball on 24 January 2016
Miguel_Zorro said:

Here's an example of a Sig that was reported today.

Not ok?  Ok?

Not ok.





Conegamer on 24 January 2016

Why anyone thought that sig was fine Miguel is beyond me.

As for the problem as mentioned, it's not a difficult thing to have more restrained avatars and sigs for general forum use, whilst keeping NSFW content purely in the NSFW camp. There's no decrease in content; just a reallocation of where the content is placed. If it's an issue and you think you MUST HAVE and NSFW avatar or sig like the one Miguel linked (or a few others going around nowadays and in the past too), then I don't know what you expect to get out of a family friendly gaming site.



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

pokoko on 24 January 2016

Thus far we have hardware, topless men, and clothed breasts added to the NSFW list. Anything else?

It's going to be interesting when Bayonetta 3 comes out and we're only allowed to show images of the backgrounds.



Around the Network
baloofarsan on 24 January 2016
Ka-pi96 said:
It's a gaming forum. By it's very definition it's not safe for work. If you're at work you shouldn't be looking at non-work related sites period.

At my work gaming sites and porn are blocked. The only gaming related site I found is Ars Technica. Oddly enough youtube is free to watch.





Chazore on 24 January 2016
pokoko said:

It kind of bugs me that the solution is as simple as turning off images but the response to that seems to be, "no, I don't want to make that effort, it's easier for me to meet my needs by making everyone else conform to an incredibly nebulous standard."

Pretty much in a nutshell.





Step right up come on in, feel the buzz in your veins, I'm like an chemical electrical right into your brain and I'm the one who killed the Radio, soon you'll all see

So pay up motherfuckers you belong to "V"

Chazore on 24 January 2016
pokoko said:
Thus far we have hardware, topless men, and clothed breasts added to the NSFW list. Anything else?

It's going to be interesting when Bayonetta 3 comes out and we're only allowed to show images of the backgrounds.

Also a good point, if those driving home the point where we can't have anything slightly NSFW related in our avis or sigs then we certainly cannot show anything even slightly nsfw related for any and all games, no use trying to make it suitable for one party but not the other.



Step right up come on in, feel the buzz in your veins, I'm like an chemical electrical right into your brain and I'm the one who killed the Radio, soon you'll all see

So pay up motherfuckers you belong to "V"

pokoko on 24 January 2016

Okay, I've added "10yearoldanimegirls" to the NSFW list.



Mike321 on 24 January 2016

Honestly the only solution I can think of is that users don't watch this site at work or school (and I have been thinking about this for a while). Sigs like the one Miguel shared should be reported tho.